"The Christianity of history is not Protestantism. If ever there were a safe truth it is this, and Protestantism has ever felt it so; to be deep in history is to cease to be a Protestant." (-John Henry Newman, An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine).

"Where the bishop is, there let the people gather; just as where ever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church". -St. Ignatius of Antioch (ca 110 AD)a martyr later thrown to the lions, wrote to a church in Asia Minor. Antioch was also where the term "Christian" was first used.

“But if I should be delayed, you should know how to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth.” 1 Timothy 3:15

"This is the sole Church of Christ, which in the Creed we profess to be one, holy, catholic and apostolic." -CCC 811

Thursday, September 1, 2011

The TRUTH behind Iglesia ni Cristo's quoting Romans 16:16?

The only way the Iglesia ni Manalo could say their registration name was "scriptural" is found in Romans 16:16 (in all translations) and Acts 20:28 ONLY in Lamsa Translations. (see this sample posted by a member of this cult). 

Both verses were willfully distorted by Mr. George Lamsa (Acts 20:28) and by the Iglesia ni Cristo (Romans 16:16) see photos below!

(Read also my earlier post Alin ang Iglesiang Binabati ng lahat ng mga iglesia ni Cristo?)


Whose translations are they using? Catholics and Protestants churches-- churches INC consider to be "APOSTATES".

Yes, you heard me right. They couldn't help themselves but RELY ONLY in Catholic and Protestant versions of the Bible!!!


It's because their cult has NO BIBLE SCHOLARS so far!!!!

Bible DISTORTERs? Yes they have in full!

So let's talk about ROMANS 16:16.

Before you may be consider believing in their twisted stories to be true, let us look CLOSELY on what’s ACTUALLY written in ROMANS 16:16 and by reading this we all hope and pray that those who were led astray by these “wolves in sheep’s clothing” DISTORTING the Scriptures to DECEIVE many may be strengthened in their faith and knowledge and eventually may become soldiers of the FAITH defending the only CHURCH of JESUS—the “PILLAR and BULWARK of TRUTH” (1 Tim 3:15; Jude 3 as quoted in the Catechism of the Catholic Church ¶ 171,) and become aggressive sowers of TRUTH.

Let us examine what is really written in ROMANS 16:16


Here are various Bible translations by different Protestant groups and sects (though some translations deviated from the original script of the Scriptures):

New International Version (©1984)
Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ send greetings.
New Living Translation (©2007)
Greet each other in Christian love. All the churches of Christ send you their greetings.
English Standard Version (©2001)
Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you.
New American Standard Bible (©1995)
Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you.
International Standard Version (©2008)
Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of the Messiah greet you.
GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
Greet each other with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you.
King James Bible
Salute one another with an holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you.
American King James Version
Salute one another with an holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you.
American Standard Version
Salute one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ salute you.
Bible in Basic English
Give one another a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ send their love to you.
Douay-Rheims Bible
Salute one another with an holy kiss. All the churches of Christ salute you.
Darby Bible Translation
Salute one another with a holy kiss. All the assemblies of Christ salute you.
English Revised Version
Salute one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ salute you.
Webster's Bible Translation
Salute one another with a holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you.
Weymouth New Testament
Salute one another with a holy kiss. All the Churches of Christ send greetings to you.


Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you.
Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible
Salute one another with an holy kiss. All the churches of Christ salute you.
The New Jerusalem Bible
Greet each other with the holy kiss. All the churches of Christ send their greetings.
Salute one another with an holy kiss. All the churches of Christ salute you.
Bible in Greek
ἀσπάσασθε ἀλλήλους ἐν φιλήματι ἁγίῳ. ἀσπάζονται ὑμᾶς αἱ ἐκκλησίαι πᾶσαι τοῦ Χριστοῦ.
Bible in Latin Vulgate
Salutate invicem in osculo sancto. Salutant vos omnes ecclesiæ Christi.

Here is the common TAGALOG VERSION of Romans 16:16

The only way that they can prove their registered name to be "scriptural" is to quote the Tagalog version of the Bible, because in English, that word "Iglesia ni Cristo" won't be heard.
Mangagbatian kayo ng banal na halik. Binabati kayo ng lahat ng mga iglesia ni Cristo.

"Greet one another with a (the) holy kiss."

In keeping with the tradition of the CHURCH, Catholic bishops and patriarchs when meeting in the CHURCH of ROME actually greet one another with a "holy kiss."  This tradition has been passed on from generation to generation that today the UNIVERSAL CHURCH is still practicing it.

On the other hand the Iglesia ni Cristo in the Philippines founded by Felix Manalo and registered it as a "Corporation Sole" obediently followed NONE of these traditions being said in Romans 16:16.  That's because they DO NOT have any HISTORICAL LINK to the First Century CHURCH of JESUS.  Although they love to quote this passage but NONE of their PAID ministers ever practice this apostolic tradition specifically mentioned in one of their favorite Bible verses.

Now, let's expose one of the many LIES they're teaching in their church. Here's the rest of the verse 16 of Romans 16:

"All the churches of  Christ greet you." [Binabati kayo ng lahat ng mga iglesia ni Cristo.

Now let's take the last sentence in Romans 16:16 (in Tagalog: Binabati kayo ng lahat ng mga iglesia ni Cristo.").

"Binabati KAYO ng LAHAT ng mga iglesia ni Cristo." (emphasis mine)

Don't be deceived.  When an INC Minister tries to prove to you that their (registered) name is somehow "scriptural" they will not read to you the Bible in English.

Part of their DECEIVING tactics is to read to you the TAGALOG version with much EMPHASIS on the 'iGLESIA NI CRISTO" and completely disregard the rest of Romans 16:16 such as ALL the churches of Christ (LAHAT ng mga iglesia ni Cristo) or the pronoun "greet YOU (KAYO)".

Now, let us open our eyes-- and let's not allow ourselves from being deceived by their Ministers twisted Holy Scriptures we all revere.  Because by just only listening you can be MISLED just as how they deceived many ignorant Catholics now becoming extremely anti-CATHOLICS.

Let us READ again the same verse using our own sense of seeing and SEE what's really in Romans 16:16.

Don't be tricked.  The main subject is not the words "iglesia ni Cristo"!

 "All the churches of  Christ greet you." [Binabati kayo ng lahat ng mga iglesia ni Cristo.]

The MAIN SUBJECT is the pronoun YOU (or KAYO)!  The "YOU" there in Romans 16:16 is NOT the "iglesia ni Cristo" founded in the Philippines but the  CHURCH of ROME and that ALL (not some, not few, not several) the churches of Christ are delighted and happy to SEND ALL THEIR GREETINGS to this ONE particular church-- the CHURCH of ROME!

See, the PRIMACY of the CHURCH in ROME is very evident in Romans 16:16 not the iglesia ni Cristo registered church.  Ninakaw lang nila ang Roma 16:16 pero hindi sila ang binabanggit doon kundi ang Iglesia natin sa ROMA-- tayong mga Katoliko!

In Wikipedia the reasons for recognizing the Primacy of the Church of Rome is stated:

"The biblical, dogmatic, theological and juridical foundation of the Primacy of the Roman Pontiff is in the Church of Christ the charisma of the munus petrinum in which is based apostolic authority of the Bishop of Rome as Vicar of Christ and Successor of the Prince of the Apostles (haereditas Petri). It is the munus petrinum who founded the Primacy of the Roman Pontiff as Successor of the Prince of the Apostles (Primus Apostolus) and Vicar of Christ (Vicarius Christi). In the teachings of the Catholic Church, the primacy of the Roman Pontiff is the apostolic authority (auctoritas) of the Successor of Peter as the Bishop of the Church of Rome (Ecclesia Romana) over the several churches. The Church of Rome, for his particular charisma, holds the presidency of the love (prokathēmenē tēs agapēs) (Ignatius of Antioch). The same concept is expressed by Irenaeus of Lyon when he speaks about the "propter potiorem principalitatem". It is also termed "papal primacy", "primacy of Peter", or "Roman primacy"; one might encounter "Peter in primacy over the universal Church," "primacy of Successor of Peter" (Successor Petri), , "Petrine Theory", Petrinity (Petrinitas) and other related expressions."
This kind of exortations can NEVER be found in any other letters of St. Paul. The SENDING of greetings of ALL the churches of Christ to the CHURCH in ROME is ONLY found in ROMANS 16:16.

Please also take note that the Letter of St. Paul is addressed to ROMANS not Filipinos!!!

Now, if Romans 16:16 is saying that ALL the churches of Christ SEND their GREETINGS to the CHURCH of ROME, why is it that this Iglesia ni Cristo founded by Felix Manalo, also claiming to be the "Church of Christ" is adamant and reluctant to SEND its greetings to the CHURCH of ROME?

Here is a PROOF that all the churches of Christ is sending their greetings to the CHURCH of ROME! (all green colors have direct greetings to the CHURCH in ROME).

Source: Wikipedia

As you can see in the map, the only countries that do not recognize the CHURCH of ROME are the countries of Mauritani, Western Sahara and Somalia in the African Continent; Saudi Arabia and Oman in the Middle East; Afghanistan, China, Brunei Darussalam, Bhutan, Myanmar (Bhurma), Laos, Vietnam and North Korea in Asia.

The latest countries that have greetings with the CHURCH of ROME are the newly independent Montenegro (2006), the United Arab Emirates (2007), Botswana (2008), the Russian Federation (2009), and Malaysia (2011). "Relations of a special nature" had previously been in place with Russia similar to those that continue to exist with the Palestinian Liberation Organization according to Wikipedia.  (Please refer here for the list of Catholic Diocese present in the whole world.)

Does it mean, the Iglesia ni Cristo in the Philippines are just only quoting Romans 16:16 for the sake of that name "iglesia ni Cristo" but TOTALLY do NOT believe on what St. Paul said?

If not then why they're quoting Romans 16:16?  Why they have to BLATANTLY DISREGARD the whole MESSAGE of TRUTH in that verse? God gave each of us the knowledge and power to ASK questions: Ask their ministers why they are not sending their greetings to the CHURCH in ROME? And why they are not GREETING one another with a HOLY KISS?

This is a church who says they are "biblical" and yet completely distorts valuable meaning of St. Paul's letter to the Church of ROME-- Romans 16:16 is just a pity.

And here are some revealing TRUTHS extracted from their OFFICIAL MAGAZINE called PASUGO:

All other newly founded churches that are claiming to be "churches of Christ are FAKES! says PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 7:
“Ang tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo ay iisa lamang, ito ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo. Kung mayroon mang nagsisibangon ngayong mga Iglesia at sasabihing sila man ay INK rin ang mga ito ay hindi tunay kundi huwad lamang!"

According to their registration, the Iglesia ni Cristo was founded by Felix Manalo and NOT Christ says PASUGO Agosto-Setyembre 1964, p. 5
“Kailan napatala sa Pamahalaan o narehistro ang INK sa Pilipinas? Noong Hulyo 27, 1914. Tunay nga na sinasabi sa rehistro na si Kapatid na F. Manalo ang nagtatag ng INK."

And lastly (but not the least), the CHURCH of ROME is CHRIST's ONLY founded CHURCH from the very beginning says PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46:
“Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo."

Did the ORIGINAL CHURCH of CHRIST vanished?

No it DID NOT says PASUGO Hunyo 1940, p. 27:
"Papaano ang pag-aalaga at pag-iingat sa pananampalataya? Wala tayong dapat gawin kundi manatili sa mga aral ng Dios na ating napag-aralan. Ito ang ginawa ng unang Iglesia. Sila'y nanatiling matibay sa aral ng mga Apostol. Ganito rin ang dapat nating gawin."

And another in PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 5:
"Ano ang katangian ng maging Tupa ni Cristo? Sa Juan 10:28 ay ganito ang sabi: 'At sila'y binigyan ko ng walang hanggang buhay, at kailanma'y hindi sila malilipol, at hindi aagawin ng sinuman sa aking kamay'. Isang dakilang kapalaran ang maging Tupa o Tauhan ni Cristo sapagkat sila'y binibigyan niya ng walang hanggang buhay at hindi sila malilipol kailan man."

(Read more at Ang Katotohanan Tungkol sa INK-1914)

Therefore, ROMANS 16:16 does NOT refer to Iglesia ni Cristo founded by Manalo in the Philippines but it's ALL about all the churches of Jesus Christ around the world GREETING the CHURCH of ROME.

So please stop deceiving yourselves.  Believe in the Bible-- the whole of the Bible and be wise enough to doubt preachers who CHOP-CHOP selective Bible verses to form a new meaning.  They are called the DECEIVERS of the Word!

God bless the CHURCH!


  1. you are the one who is being deceived, because you only try to emphasize one of the verses in the holy bible which your twisted mind can only understand. you are the ones whom are being fooled by a mere person who do you not know that the wealth of your so called pope was coming from all of misled and ignorant catholic members...ask your priests if even one of their teachings to you was not even close to mere truth...ask also your cardinals, are they GOD to make a person holy? just like when they proclaim a person or "POPE" as a saint... do they have the power of GOD to do this so? remember; only GOD can make a person holy... if you answered yes they can proclaim, you also acknowledge on your so called understanding that this persons who proclaim a person as saints is your GOD....

    1. Mr. Brainwashed by the Manalos, stop dreaming. Wake up and have a reality check. Your Manalos are the ones enriching themselves.

      And what you're talking about is purely nonsense. Di mo alam ang sinasabi mo Mr. MANALISTA. Kailangan mo pa ng another centennary para maunawaan mo ang Iglesiang tatag ng Dios... ang Iglesia Katolika. INCorporated lang ang INComplete INC of Manalo.

    2. It seems that Mr. Cath Def is the one being brainwashed by a four century old lie and is need of a reality check. I've read somewhere here that INC members are rude when it comes to comments but it seems you are the one who is rude. There are a lot of things that "your" Catholic Church is doing wrong and are against the true teachings so I suggest you do some more thinking. I truly sympathize on how you are being deceived.

    3. Mind to elaborate the wrong doings of every other religion by their doctrine and not by the individual(which means this won't include any kind of crime like murder,rape,theft,whatever crime because those are things exclusive as a fault to a single individual and not the Church itself)...please elaborate the wrong things in their teachings and doctrine(again,don't ever use the old "because they have a doctrine" thing,you too have a doctrine so please tell me something else) I'm not all out on this,I am just fond of these religious reasoning wars here so I might as well run my curiosity meter and try to learn something of human or godly nature.

    4. pagmagsimba ka sa catholic...wala kang maririnig na paninira kundi yong about lang sa bible at mga pangyayari kay jesus yun lang ...1 time inakay ako diko agad like kasi imbes na magsaba ng bible at magturo sa kabutihan paninira kaagad yong naririnig ko ...paniwalaan nyo ang gusto ninyong paniwalaan wag na lang kayo manira ng ibat ibang relegion ...

  2. The teachings of INC is based on the Bible .. Not on Mr. Manalo ..

    1. Talaga lang ha?


      1- PASUGO May 1961, p.4
      “At sino nga ba ang gumagawa ng mga leksiyong itinuturo ng mga ministro, maging sa mga pagsamba, mga doktrina o mga Propaganda? Ang Kapatid na Felix Manalo.”

      2- PASUGO Mayo 1963, p. 27:
      “Kaya’t sa katuparan ng hula, ang lahat ng mga itinuturo ng mga Ministro ng INK sa mga pagsamba, sa mga doktrina, sa mga pamamahayag sa gitna ng baya, ay si Kapatid na Felix Manalo lamang ang bumabalangkas at nagtuturo sa kanila.”

    2. Hindi rin po pala ninyo naiintindihan ang nakasulat sa aming Pasugo na kino-quote ninyo. Maliwanag na maliwanag sa amin na mga kaanib sa INC ang kahulugan ng mga yan, pero sa inyo pala na nasa labas ng INC na mga CFD ay talinhaga kaya di ninyo maunawa. Tutulungan ko po kayo na maunawaan yan.

      Pansinin po ninyo na ang nakasulat, "Ang GUMAGAWA NG LEKSYONG itinuturo sa .... Ang kapatid na Felix Manalo." (emphasis mine)

      Ang mga itinuturo ng mga Ministro ... ay si kapatid na Felix Manalo lamang ang BUMABALANGKAS AT NAGTUTURO." (emphasis mine)

      Simple lang po ang kahulugan niyan. Ang mga ginagawa po ni Ka Felix Manalo o mga binabalangkas na mga leksyon ay MULA SA MGA TALATA NG BIBLIA na kanyang inihahanay o gumagawa siya ng “LESSON OUTLINE” para maging gabay ng mga Ministro na kanyang tinuturuan o ginagamit sa mga pagsamba at Pamamahayag ng INC.


      Sana po ay natulungan ko po kayong muli na maituwid ang mga mali ninyong pagkaunawa.

  3. Is that the way you think that all INC members are rude? Well, think again my friend. How about Catholics? Some of them are also rude in commenting? How come you don't moderate them? I'm not here for any Dialogue or something. I know you have your own belief and we have our own belief. So please respect our belief and we'll respect your belief too.. God Bless....

    1. Anonymous INC™, for an INC™ member, there is nothing good from a Catholic. In fact, your own founder and sugo already judged Catholics, branded them as all evil, your comment about rude Catholics (or not) is irrelevant.

      The reason why we are pointing out your own filthiness is because in all your programs you PROJECT your INC™ Religion as if it's the only SPOTLESS religion in the world when in fact your INC™ Church is now reaping "karma".

      Now you are tasting your own poison. God is good all the time, He let's you drink from your own venom!

      Yes, no matter how you defend your INC™ Religion, you remain FAKE CHURCH!

  4. Some people can't understand the meaning of the Bible. They were just deceived and take all the words that their leaders told them. They posted ten commandments in their chapels but they keep doing the don'ts of God. They are just insecure that INC is very successful now and fast growing around the world. I hope they can open their mind and understand the meaning of the verses inside the Bible. Nakakaawa sila kasi mali ang sinasampalatayanan nila.

    1. The DECEIVER is the the PREACHERS, SUGOS, PASTORS, MINISTERS who DENY JESUS (GOD) COMING IN THE FLESH. "Such are the deceiver and anti-Christ! (2 John 1:7)...

      Felix Manalo DENIED JESUS--GOD who came in the FLESH. Felix fulfilled every scriptural reference about the coming of the deceiver and anti-Christ!

      Yes, INC™ Religion was founded by a DECEIVER and an ANTI-CHRIST for denying JESUS GOD COMING IN THE FLESH!

  5. this I would have to say a poor argument, try to research more what is the name of the church founded by christ(cristo) I'm no bible scholar but I believe mathew 16:18 needs an explanation where it reveals the name of the church founded by christ on rome 16:16, if not iglesia ni cristo then what is the name of the church founded by christ and where in the Bible you can find the name. if the answer would be not in the bible then the answer is invalid for teachings about religion and Christianity is only found in the bible.

    1. May nalalaman ka pang research loool. Did you know that Jesus never commanded his apostles to NAME a Church to him. So that that 'churches of Christ' in Romans 16:16 is NOT a proper noun but a common nouns such as church of Corinth, church of Rome, church of Athens, and all of these churches belong to Christ but not to the 'Iglesia Ni Cristo". In the year 110AD in ANTIOCH where Christians were named as such, the church was names as 'CATHOLIC' by St. Ignatius, 1,804 years before the Church of Felix Manalo was founded in Punta, Sta. Ana in the Philippines.

      In the meantime, please read from Timeline of Catholicism.

      So there you are, that's what it means to research.

  6. Iglesia Ni Cristo. Mga taga sunod nya. Mahal Nya ang knyang iglesia na knyang tinubos ng dugo. Those who do evil and against the true teaching of christ the lord,doesn't have right to be called and be part of the church of Christ.

    Habang sila'y nang alipusta sa atin tayo ay palalakasin nya at palalaguin ng Ama. Amen.


    1. Haze Blogs,

      Alin o ano ang tumalikod, IGLESIA o TAO?

      Kung IGLESIA ang tumalikod, bigyan mo ako ng talata sa Biblia na sinabi ni Cristo na matatalikod ang kanyang itinatag na Iglesia at ito ay susulpot muli sa Pilipinas. Bigyan mo ako ng kahit isang saknong sa AKLAT NG KASAYSAYAN na nagsasabing NATALIKOD nga ng ganap ang Iglesiang tatag ni Cristo.

      Kung TAO ang tumalikod, SI FELIX MANALO ang tumalikod sa Iglesia. Samakatuwid, ang IGLESIA AY NASA KATUWIRAN at KATOTOHANAN at si FELIX MANALO ang nasa kasadlakan sampu ng kanyang mga dinayang alagad.


  7. @Haze Blogs...The Catholic Church is clear in the Bible. Catholic means “Universal" or "FOR ALL THE NATIONS” . Jesus testified that his "Church" would be called "Catholic." Christ said to his disciples...“My House will be called House of Prayer “FOR ALL THE NATIONS”(Mark 11:17) which means "Catholic", we may say that all apostles are "Catholic." We all know that this "House" means the "Church." (1Timothy 3:15. Catholic = From Kata (Kata) and Holos (Holos) / Kath oles (Katholis) "Kata" = prep.“Throughout” (Greek New Testament Dictionary) Page 92, "Holos" = Whole, all, complete, entire, altogether, wholly–Greek Dict. Page 125, "Catholic" = or “Universal” in English / in Latin bible "universae ecclesia" Romans 16:23) = in tagalog "iglesia katolika". Kaya NAGKAMALI ho si Mr.Felix Manalo sa kanyang pagpatayo ng kanyang sariling simbahan dahil "tapos" nang itinayo ni Kristo ang "nag-iisang" simbahan na Katolika sa yr.33 AD, Jerusalem dahil Siya lang ay may karapatan magtayo ng Iglesia hindi ang tao. At pinalipat ito sa Roma by the persons of St. Peter & Paul dahil Hindi tinanggap si Cristo sa kanyang sariling bayan. Juan 1:11. Atsaka labis ang pag-uusig sa Iglesia doon sa Jerusalem, Acts 8:1 Kaya nagtampo si Cristo sa Jerusalem dahil piñatay nila ang mga propeta. “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee...etc. Mt. 23:37-38. At ito ay kanyang aalisin at ipagkakatiwala sa Bayang mamumunga nang masagana, Mt.21:43. Kaya sa Roma ay nagbunga o tinatawag na mga Santo o pagkabanal, Rom.1:7. Church tradition ascribes the epistles First and Second Peter to Apostle Peter, as does the text of Second Peter itself. First Peter implies the author is in "Babylon," which has been held to be a coded reference to Rome. “The church that is in Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you: and so doth.” (1 Peter 5:13). Babylon is a code word for Rome and is used elsewhere in Scripture to mean the same thing, examples can be found in Revelation 18:2, 18:10 and 18:21. Anybody who denied Peter was not gone to Rome is a bogus story or he was deceived by a false writer. And this is just a short story of how the Catholic church was originated by Christ itself by saying...“And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” Mt.16:18.

  8. Pag luhod palang sa rebulto, pag lalagay ng kung anu anung alay, pag halik sa rebulto, hindi nyo na mapapagawa yan sa tunay na natawag. Ang bahay sambahan ay hindi kanlungan ng mga maymasasamang loob, matitiwalag talaga ang gagawa ng ikasasama nito, hindi ang Iglesia ang sinsabihan nyong na karma? nasan yun? Nakatayo parin ang INC, namamayagpag. pinipilahan ang pagKalinga (Lingap) ng INC ng nga kababayang katoliko. Hindi ito naiisipang gawing kalakalan ang sagradong bahay sambahan.Di pa ba malinaw yun? Nasa bible ang di pagkain ng dugo pero ginagawa parin.may Purgatoryo, kumpil, binyag na buhos lang sa ulo ng isang batang ni malinis pa sa mga umuusig sa INC. Mapanghihina nyo ba kami sa mga pang uusig ninyo? e nasa biblia ang mga taong umuusig talaga, lalu na kay Kristo nun.


Comments are moderated by the blog owner.

Thank you and God bless you.

My Blog List

My Calendar

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...