Samu't saring kaipokrituhan ng Iglesia Ni Cristo® o INC™ sa Facebook

 Ano ba ang binibilang ng Gregorian Calendar na 2014, ang Centenario ng INC™ o ang edad ng Iglesia Katolika?

 Kanino ba talaga ang Iglesia Ni Cristo® -1914? Bakit puro MANALO lamang ang mga hinihirang na mga "papa"? [Mula sa kaliwa: Felix Y. Manalo-tagapagtatag; Eduardo V. Manalo - apo ni Felix Manalo, tagapagmana; Eraño G. Manalo - anak ni Felix Manalo-tagapagmana]

 Iglesia De Cristo® o Iglesia Ni Cristo® o Kirche de Cristo® o Iglesia Ni Cristo-(Church of Christ), ano pa man ang pagkasalin sa ibang wika ay IISA lamang OFFICIAL LOGO at iisa ang MAY-ARI nito at walang iba kundi si FELIX MANALO at ang PANANALAPI ay pinamamahalaan ng pamilya Manalo sa Central (at Local) sa Pilipinas!

 Hindi lamang sa pangalan nakikilala ang INC™  sa ibang bansa kundi sa LOGO nito! Makakaasa ang bawat kaanib ng Iglesia Ni Cristo® na tunay ito kung makikita ang opisyal na LOGO ng INC™-- patunay na ito nga ang Iglesiang TATAG ni Felix Y. Manalo sa Pilipinas noong 1914.

EVM = Eduardo V. Manalo!

Anong meron sa  EVM at kailangang talagang malaking titik ang mga letrang EV sa EVangelical at M sa Mission? At anong meron sa kulay na GREEN-WHITE-RED sa EVM?

Magiging banal ba ang isang kaanib ng INC™ kung susundin lahat ng mga alituntuning ibinabahagi ng kanilang pamunuan? Ito ba ay NASUNOD ng yumaong SUGO na si FELIX MANALO? Naging banal ba siya noong siya'y nabubuhay?

Why we need to talk about the real enemy: ISLAMIC JIHAD!

In response to TERRORIST ATTACK IN PARIS FRANCE, we need to look seriously what Islam and Muslims can do to us if we dare to question their beliefs!

What you will learn from this video are:

• History of the Quran
• HIstory of Islam
• Life of Muhammad
• Why Jews and Christians were expelled from Madina and the entire the Middle East
• The Crusades
• Dhimmitude
• History of the Islamic Caliphate under the Turks
• Muslim Brotherhood
• The State of Israel
• Political Correctness
• Rising of Islam in the West and their agenda to dominate
• What we can do as INFIDELS (non-Muslims)
• Who are we in the eyes of Muslims and who are the Muslims.

THANK YOU MS. BRIGITTE GABRIEL! Add her at Twitter @act4america 

Is Islam Really a Peaceful Religion? (with quotes from the Quran)

Today, the world again was in SHOCKED when Breaking News around the world showed three (3) masked gunmen killed 12 French Satirists on a broad daylight.  The three gunmen were identified as MUSLIMS trying to AVENGE their Prophet after Charles Hebdo published a cartoon depicting Muslims prophet satirically.  

In the Facebook page of Al-Jazeera, floods of comments poured in, with some Muslims justifying the killing for insulting their prophet Muhammad, some condemn (taqqia)!

So we are back to the same question: HOW PEACEFUL IS ISLAM and MUSLIMS when they are criticized? Thanks to Dr. Taylor Marshall for this brilliant post! -CD2000

By Dr. Taylor Marshall

Is Islam a peaceful religion? Let’s not ask the news sources or the Islamic Studies college profs. Let’s just look at what the Quran itself says. You make the decision for yourself.

Before you look at the verses in the Quran, here are three things to consider:

1. Muhammad was a military leader. He was more of a general than a guru. Historical records (Islamic and secular) record the battles and raids of Muhammad. Here’s a Quran verse on that topic: Quran (8:67) – “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land…”
2. In the pattern of Muhammad, leaders of Islam are not immams, pastors, or priests. They are political militaristic leaders. Here’s a Quran verse on that topic: “Quran (47:35) – “Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you.”
3. Why did the Crusades (the first pan-Christian wars) begin in the middle east after Islam began invading and attacking Christian settlements in the 8th through 11th centuries? Could it be that Islam introduced something new the euro-asian political sphere that got things out of whack?

Okay, and now for the verses from the Quran

(This were collected from this site.)

The Quran contains a mandate to kill

The first example explains how those who wage war against Allah should be:

• crucified

• murdered

• have their hands cut off

• have their feet maimed

• imprisoned

Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement.”

Here’s a verse criticizing Muslim’s remain “peaceful” and refuse to fight:

Quran (4:95) – “Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward.” 

Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing…but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)” 

Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.” Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

Quran (4:74) – “Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.” 

Quran (4:76) – “Those who believe, fight in the cause of Allah…” 

Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.” 

Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah” 

Quran (8:57) – “If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”

So there are words from the Quran. If you want to understand a religion, read its original texts. They will show you the truth on the matter. Again, make your own conclusions.

Former Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) - Alfie Angeles - Bumalik sa pagiging Katoliko

Isang malaking PASABOG ng isang DATING IGLESIA NI CRISTO na ngayo'y BUMALIK sa INANG IGLESIA! Salamat po kay Bro. Atty. Marwil Llasos, OP at mga kasamahan sa TV Maria at KNOW THE TRUTH sa kanilang talino at dedikasyon sa pagpapalaganap ng pananampalatayang Katoliko.

The QUR'AN vs. the BIBLE, which is the True Word of God

From The Blade of Truth

A message to the LEFT MEDIA in Germany and to the WORLD! WAKE UP EUROPE! WAKE UP GERMANY!

This JEWISH Man is not a pro-Nazi. He is just an ordinary German citizen who oppose to the ISLAMIZATION of GERMANY and EUROPE!

WAKE UP EUROPE! WAKE UP GERMANY!

Here WATCH below video and hear these MUSLIMS around the WORLD how they talk against YOU and ME!

LONG LIVE GERMANY! LONG LIVE EUROPE!





And HERE is the REASON why EUROPEANS should be ALARMED!




MUSLIMS CONQUERED LONDON, BERLIN and PARIS!

Muslim Leaders Declare Aim Of World Domination. Rome, London, Spain, Paris, America, ISIS

MUST WATCH!

Our political policies have failed us when Muslim immigrants are UNWILLING to ASSIMILATE within our societies. They refuse to pledge allegiance to our country's CONSTITUTION but to Islam and Muhammad. They want SHARIAH to be the law within our democratic countries.  Now, every Muslim is making headlines with a CLEAR INTENTION of ISLAMICIZING the Christian world (secular world) including ROME and the VATICAN STATES.  Our POLITICIANS have failed us and our RELIGIOUS LEADERS do not directly condemn violent verses form the Quran and Hadiths out of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. If we keep silent, soon ISLAM will SILENCE our rights to voice our objection.  While we are still DEMOCRATIC, let's say NO TO ISLAMIZATION and NO TO SHARIAH!

IT'S TIME! We need another CRUSADES!

THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO CALLS ERAÑO G. MANALO FATHER

Article Originally Posted at KNOW THE TRUTH by Atty. MARWIL N. LLASOS, OP

The Iglesia ni Cristo “Pope”: “Tatay” Erdie

The Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) is mad as hell against the Catholic Church which they consider to be an apostate Church. INC ministers routinely attack Catholics for calling the Pope and the priests “father.” They charge that the Pope makes himself equal with God because he allows himself to be called “father.” The INC, of course, bases its misplaced arguments on Matthew 23:9 which says, “And do not call anyone on earth ‘father,’ for you have one Father, and he is in heaven” (NIV).

But, as usual, the INC is hypocritical. While the INC slams the Catholic Church for calling its Pope and priests as “father,” nevertheless, INC members call their late Executive Minister Eraño G. Manalo as “tatay.”

Hypocrisy: The Iglesia ni Cristo denounces Catholics for calling
the Pope and priests “father,” yet they call their late Executive
Minister as “tatay” – which means “father.” Screen shot used with
permission from The Splendor of the Church Facebook page)

What does “tatay” mean?

Tagalog.Dictionary.Com defines “tatay” as:[1]

Tatay

t´atay n. father (term of address and reference)

Related:

father

father n. 1 male parent: ama 2 col- loquial term used by children, etc.: tatay, itay, tatang, 3 religious term: padre, pari

Like the Greek word pappas or the Latin term papa,[2] the Tagalog word tatay is a term of endearment used by children to address their father. It has the same meaning as the Aramaic word abba[3] – in English, daddy.[4]

INC members do not only consider or treat the late Eraño G. Manalo as father,[5] but they call him as such – Tatay Erdie. This once again shows the INC’s double standard and rank hypocrisy. I thought Matthew 23:9 prohibits calling any man on earth “father.” Yet, the Iglesia ni Cristo calls Eraño G. Manalo with the very same title the Lord Jesus taught us to call God, Abba (Lk. 11:2) – Daddy – Tatay.

Tatay means Daddy: What’s so hard to understand about this?

The INC condemns Catholics for calling the Pope and priests father, yet they do the same thing to their Executive Minister.

“You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things” (Rom. 2:1, NIV).

Character actor John Regala called the late
INC Executive Minister “Tatay Erdy” when he was still an INC

Iglesia ni Cristo members greet the late Eraño Manalo “happy birthday.”
Here an INC member called the dead birthday celebrant “Tatay.”

Calling the late Eraño Manalo Tatay is not an isolated
incident among the members of the Iglesia ni Cristo.
Here you can see how the INC addresses its late Executive
Minister with “We love you, Tatay.”

More and more INC members call the dead Eraño Manalo
“Tatay.” What happened to Matthew 23:9 among the INC?

[1] http://www.tagalog-dictionary.com/cgi-bin/search.pl?s=tatay

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope

[3] http://biblehub.com/greek/5.htm

[4]http://tagaloglang.com/Tagalog-English-Dictionary/English-Translation-of-Tagalog-Word/tatay.html

[5] http://www.pep.ph/news/23034/Former-actress-Klaudia-Koronel-grieves-the-death-of-INC_

A GERMAN'S VIEW OF ISLAM - WORTH A READ

From Islam Uncovered

This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read.

The author's references to past history are accurate and clear. It's not a lengthy read, it's easy to understand, and it's well worth the read.

The author of this email is Dr.Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist.

A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates.

When he was asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.

'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.

My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'

We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.

The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history.

It is the fanatics who march.

It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide.

It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave.

It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honour-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque.

It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals.

It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous.

Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.

China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people..

The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet.

And who can forget Rwanda , which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence.

Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany , they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.

Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late..

Now Islamic prayers have been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario , and, yes, in Ottawa too, while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.

In Australia , and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly-consumed food items have the halal emblem on them.

Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket.

Food on aircraft have the halal emblem, just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation’s' shores.

In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of “no-go” zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuse to acknowledge British law.

As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts - the fanatics who threaten our way of life.

Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passivity that allows the problems to expand. So, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on! Let us hope that thousands, world-wide, read this and think about it, and they also continue to send it on - before it's too late.

And we are silent......and then.....silenced.

UNITED IN HATE: Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC), Born-Again (BA), Jehovah's Witnesses (JW), Jesus Is Lord (JIL), Seventh-Day Adventists (SDA), Sedevacantists (SSPX), Islam (ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, Abu Sayyaf, etc)

Dito niyo makikita ang mga NAGKAKAISANG mga PROTESTANTE LABAN sa IGLESIA KATOLIKA na siyang TUNAY na IGLESIANG TATAG NI CRISTO.

Bagamat alam na alam nilang ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA ang TUNAY, kaya pilit nilang MINAMALI ang mga ARAL nito at PINAPALABAS na ang LAHAT ng mga KATURUAN at PAGSAMBA ng mga KATOLIKO ay LABAG sa BIBLIA.

Kailangan nilang MANLINLANG at MANDAYA para lamang MAKAAKIT ng kaanib. 

Wala po sila sa PANIG ng KATOTOHANAN. Nasa panig po sila ng KASINUNGALINGAN at PANDARAYA!

At dahil alam nilang TAYO ANG NAGBUO ng BANAL NA BIBLIA kaya't hindi nila ito INAARAL sa kanilang mga kaanib!

Magpuri po tayong mga Katoliko sapagkat KUNG PAANO INUSIG ang DIOS nating si CRISTO ay hindi po tayo makananaig. Ang ating PAGDURUSA natin dahil sa PAG-UUSIG ay isang PAGTATAGUMPAY ng KANYANG IGLESIA. 

Patunay lamang ito dahil ngayon po ay nasa 2,015 YEARS na po ang ATING IGLESIA! -CD2000

John Ferrer Kapatid akoy 40 taon na bilang Katoliko pero ni isang salita at talata tungkol sa PURGATORYO, ROSARYO, ITIM NA NAZARENO, STO NINO, AT ANG PAGSASAMBA SA MGA REBULTO NG MGA SANTO AT NI INANG MARIA NA GAWA NG TAO ay WALA SA BIBLYA! Kaya akoy nagkusang umalis ay tinahak , hinanap ang TOTOONG MGA SALITA AT UTOS NG DIYOS- BIBLYA!

John Ferrer Isiah 42:8 ! " I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I NOT GIVE TO ANOTHER, NEITHER MY PRAISE TO GRAVEN IMAGES" . But why the Catholic church even the popes themselves wön't stop people giving praises , worshiping graven images statues , relics of dead people even allowing people kiss the ring in their hands! Honestly i'm 40 years as a Roman Catholic, 40 years of being decieved and mislead by false doctrines! Everyone has the RIGHT TO FIND THE TRUE TEACHINGS OF JESUS CHRIST TO DISCOVER THE TRUE WORDS AND COMMANDMENT OF GOD, SO IN THE END MAY SAVE YOUR SOUL AND EVEN OTHER SOULS: WAKE UP MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS! GOD BLESS US ALL! 

John Ferrer The question is: why do all the popes tolerate people t worship graven images including what he's holding, even letting people kiss their rings or hands, why did they not stop the false teachings of their churches like praying repeated prayers like the rosary. Deutoronomy 5:7-9, Mathew 6:7-13, Acts 17:29, Jerimiah 2:27, Habacuck 2:18-19, Galatians 4:8, and Mathew 23:9 ( "and call no man your father upon earth: for one is your FATHER, which is in heaven')

John Ferrer CHRISTIANITY ang itinatag ni CHRISTO - ibig sabihin taga sunod ni CHRISTO at hindi Katoliko. hindi paninira ang pumuna sa maling aral na magiging dahilan ng ikipapahamak ng iba, oo ngat mahigit 2000 taon na ang Katoliko, d ba kau nagtataka at maraming umaalis sa relihyong ito dahil marami ang namumulat sa KATOTOHANAN na naaayon sa BIBLYA na kasalungat ng mga TURO, ARAL AT MGA DOKTRINA NG SIMBAHANG KATOLIKO.

John Ferrer wala sa Biblya ang salitang KRISTYANISMO kundi taga sunod ni KRISTO, sa makatuwid KRISTYANO ANG TINAWAG SA MGA TAGA SUNOD NI KRISTO ALANGAN NAMANG KATOLIKO O MUSLIM! ang tawag sa mga taga sunod ni Satanas syempre mga Satanista alangan namang Kristyano , kapatid, isipin mo nga kapatid

John Ferrer since 33A.D . pa pala kayo naliko! kung ang BIBLYA ang paguusapan naniniwala akong totoo lahat ng nakasulat ngunit kung sa mga turo ng katoliko, maraming salungat sa nakasulat sa BIBLYA kapatid. saan nyo mababasa na dapat magvenerate sa mga taong patay na, rosaryo na paulit2 na dasal, pagukit at pagsamba ng mga imahe gawa ng kamay, ang pagbinyag sa mga kapa2nganak na bata baka mapunta sa LIMBO, ang PURGATORYO ? pasensya na kapatid at isang buwan palang ako nagbabasa ng BIBLYA

DR. ALBERT EINSTEIN EXTOLLED THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AS THE LONE VOICE AGAINST HITLER

By The Splendor of the Church

Albert Einstein, addressing the Catholic Church’s role during the Holocaust, said the following:

“Being a lover of freedom, when the revolution came in Germany, I looked to the universities to defend it, knowing that they had always boasted of their devotion to the cause of truth; but, no, the universities immediately were silenced. Then I looked to the great editors of the newspapers whose flaming editorials in days gone by had proclaimed their love of freedom; but they, like the universities, were silenced in a few short weeks… “Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler’s campaign for suppressing truth. I never had any special interest in the Church before, but now I feel a great affection and admiration because the Church alone has had the courage and persistence to stand for intellectual truth and moral freedom. I am forced thus to confess that what I once despised I now praise unreservedly.” DR. ALBERT EINSTEIN [December 23, 1940 issue of Time magazine on page 38.]

Einstein: The Church alone stood for intellectual truth and moral freedom
By: Mary Meets Dolly

The Church today still stands for intellectual truth and moral freedom. Although the propaganda that surrounds us says otherwise. But it is the Church that speaks for the human embryo that is frozen, sold, discarded or torn apart for harvestable biological material. It is the Church that reminds us that we all began our lives as small as the period at the end of this sentence and our size does not diminish our worth. It is the Church that stands firm against the creation and manipulation of human life in the laboratory. It is the Church that speaks out against the seek-and-destroy mission going on in the womb against those that are not deemed "genetically fit." The truth is that when the Church stands for the embryo and fetus, it stands for the inherent dignity in every human life regardless of DNA or point of development.

The Nazi's dehumanized the Jews and other "undesirables" and the Church stood for them, however imperfectly. Now the Church is nearly alone in standing for the youngest and most voiceless members of our species. Those that many have gone to great lengths to insist are not human. We know better. I pray that those who despise the Church today will see in the future what the Church has done to protect the most vulnerable and innocent of lives and will praise it unreservedly as Einstein did.

For Muslim apostates, giving up their faith can be terrifying, alienating and dangerous

[Source: National Post] In many Muslim-majority countries, renouncing Islam is a crime punishable by death. But even in the liberal West, some ex-Muslims continue to fear leaving their faith. Although reformists point to the Qur’anic ruling,”there is no compulsion in religion,” they hide their disbelief or risk being ostracized by their families and the wider ummah (community) of believers. In extreme cases they believe their status as “apostates of the faith” puts them in danger. Simon Cottee, a senior lecturer in criminology at Kent University, England., interviewed 35 former Muslims in Britain and Canada as part of the first major sociological study of ex-Muslims in the west. He based this piece on fieldwork in Canada.

Halima is an 18-year-old biology student from a strict Muslim family in Ontario.

Although she continues to wear the hijab and dresses conservatively, Halima no longer prays or fasts. Nor does she abide by the restrictions against alcohol and pork, and she has all but forgotten the Qur’an — the holy book she once had committed to memory.

“They think I’m a bad Muslim,” she says of her family, “but I doubt if they’d ever think I’m an ex-Muslim.”

She adds she cannot imagine what would happen if she told her father, a well-known religious leader. “That would be the end. He would never accept my apostasy.”

Halima, who asked that her real name not be used, has good reason for concern.

“There was a lot of pressure to be completely religious,” she says of her childhood. And any and all deviations were vigorously punished.

She remembers one incident in particular.

“There was a tear in a page and my father assumed I’d ripped it,” she says. “He got my hand — and put it on the stove.”

After a teacher noticed the burn, the Children’s Aid Society interviewed her parents, who said it was an accident. CAS didn’t pursue the matter, but this did little to placate her father, who castigated her for bringing “kaffirs” (unbelievers) into the house.

‘I just couldn’t agree with most of the stuff, especially with the treatment of women — that got me out of Islam’

Halima still spent up to three hours a day studying Arabic and the Qur’an into her teen years, and rarely missed the five daily prayers that are obligatory for Muslims.

But ultimately, she says, “I just couldn’t agree with most of the stuff, especially with the treatment of women — that got me out of Islam.”

In her mid-teens, she also discovered the online forum of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, which gave her the courage to finally admit to herself she didn’t believe anymore and wanted to leave the faith. Before that, she “had never even heard of apostates.”

In the past few months, Halima finally had to take action.

Last year, her father started proceedings to bring a friend over from Yemen, a man in his mid-50s, to marry his daughter. Under immense pressure, she agreed to the engagement and signed the sponsorship papers to enable him to settle in Canada. But she couldn’t go through with it and fled her home.

“I just filled in two bags of my papers and stuff and told my brother, ‘I have to take out the trash,’ and there was a cab waiting for me and I went straight to the shelter.”

Her flight has confused as well as enraged her parents.

“Come home — or you’ll regret it,” her father recently warned her on Facebook.

————————————

Zain, 27, is one of the few who has disclosed his apostasy to his family. Born in Britain to Pakistani parents, he came to Canada at age 20.

“As a kid I really believed with all my heart, but my faith just kind of went away,” he says. “It flickered out. I stopped feeling the presence of God. And that’s when I took seriously the possibility of Islam being wrong.”

Discovering philosophy — now one of his passions, especially the iconoclastic works of Friedrich Nietzsche — led him to conclude “there really isn’t a defence for any of it [religion].”

It also opened his mind to different points of view. “I realized that I don’t want to stick to just one way of looking at the world.”

By 19 he was agnostic — and in love with Mel, a Winnipeg woman he met online. They decided to elope and she flew to Britain.

But somehow Zain’s family found out and intercepted them at the airport. An uncle was especially furious: “He’s a tough guy who likes to throw his weight around and he was saying, ‘I could chop you up into little pieces and put you in the Thames right now and no one will find out.’” His father also was angry, telling him not “ruin his life for a girl.”

Why there are no Muslim converts to Christianity? Well... they are KILLED!

[From JihadWatch]“I could chop you up into little pieces and put you in the Thames”

“I could chop you up into little pieces and put you in the Thames right now and no one will find out.” 

Those words were spoken by a Muslim uncle to his ex-Muslim nephew. This article tells the stories of several ex-Muslims, but it doesn’t explain why it has proven so difficult for them to leave Islam — indeed, true to form for the mainstream media, it gives the impression that Muslims who threaten or shun apostates are violating the Qur’an’s dictum that “there is no compulsion in religion” (2:256). Author Simon Cottee doesn’t mention, and may not know, that a hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him” (Bukhari 9.84.57). The death penalty for apostasy is part of Islamic law according to all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence. This is still the position of all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence, both Sunni and Shi’ite. Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent Muslim cleric in the world, has stated: “The Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-`ashriyyah, Al-Ja`fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.” There is only disagreement over whether the law applies only to men, or to women also – some authorities hold that apostate women should not be killed, but only imprisoned in their houses until death.

“For Muslim apostates, giving up their faith can be terrifying, alienating and dangerous,” by Simon Cottee, National Post, January 2, 2015 (thanks to Daniel):

In many Muslim-majority countries, renouncing Islam is a crime punishable by death. But even in the liberal West, some ex-Muslims continue to fear leaving their faith. Although reformists point to the Qur’anic ruling,”there [sic] is no compulsion in religion,” they hide their disbelief or risk being ostracized by their families and the wider ummah (community) of believers. In extreme cases they believe their status as “apostates of the faith” puts them in danger. Simon Cottee, a senior lecturer in criminology at Kent University, England., [sic] interviewed 35 former Muslims in Britain and Canada as part of the first major sociological study of ex-Muslims in the west. He based this piece on fieldwork in Canada.

Halima is an 18-year-old biology student from a strict Muslim family in Ontario.

Although she continues to wear the hijab and dresses conservatively, Halima no longer prays or fasts. Nor does she abide by the restrictions against alcohol and pork, and she has all but forgotten the Qur’an — the holy book she once had committed to memory.

“They think I’m a bad Muslim,” she says of her family, “but I doubt if they’d ever think I’m an ex-Muslim.”

SHOCKING NEWS: THE MUSLIM PRIEST SAID THAT “ALL MUSLIM MUST CHANGE TO CHRISTIAN TO AVOID HELL FIRE”

Read the original story: MARIO JOSEPH: MUSLIM IMAM CONVERTED TO CATHOLIC CHURCH

[Source: Linda Ikejist] While I was working in a muslim mosque as an imam, as a parish priest, I preach in my parish that Jesus Christ is not God, for me, God was only Allah, and I believed Allah never got married, so no sons for Allah. So I preached there that Jesus is not God. Then somebody ask me, who is Jesus?’’ from the crowd. Maybe a muslim, but he asked me, who is Jesus?’’ I was preaching he is not God, but the question is who is he? To know who is Jesus? I read the entire Koran once again: 114 chapters, 6666 in the Koran when I read it, the name of prophet Muhammad. I found it in Koran 4 places, but the name of Jesus I found in 25 places. There itself, I was a little confused. Why does the Koran give more preference to Jesus? And second thing, I could not see any woman’s name in Koran: the Prophet Muhammad’s mother’s name, or wife’s name, no, in the Koran, there is only one woman’s name that i found is Mariam, the mother of Jesus no other woman’s name. And in the holy Koran chapter 3, the name of the chapter is family of Mariam,’’ and holy Koran chapter 19, the name of the chapter itself is ‘’MARIAM’’ one chapter is ‘’MARIAM’’ so I was very curious to know why does Koran says all these things about MARIAM, holy Koran chapter 3 verse 34 onwards says that Mary was born without original sin, she never committed any sin in her life, she was ever virgin.

Koran chapter 50 verses 23 say that she went to heaven with her physical body. Even the assumption is writing in the holy Koran and then about Jesus, when I read chapter 3 verses 45 to 55 verses, there is 10 point which the Koran makes about Jesus. The first thing Koran says (kallimatulli) the arabic word which means ‘’the of God’’ and second thing is ( ahimokuli ) which mean spirit of God and the third (isa masi) which means Jesus Christ so Koran give the name for Jesus WORD OF GOD, SPIRIT OF GOD, JESUS CHRIST. And then Koran says that Jesus spoke when he was very small, like 2 days old. after his birth he began to speak , Koran says that Jesus created a live bird with mud. He took some mud, he formed a bird; when breathed into it, it became a live bird. So I think Jesus can give life because he gave life to mud, clay, and then Koran says that Jesus cured a man born blind and a man with leprosy, e.t.c

Curiously, the Koran says that Jesus gave life to dead people; Jesus went to heaven; he is still alive and he will come again. When I saw all these things in the Koran I taught of what Koran says about Muhammad, according to the Koran, prophet Muhammad is not the word of God, not spirit of God he never spoke when he was 2 days old, he never created any bird with mud, he never cure any sick people, he never raised any dead people, he himself died, and according to Islam he is not alive and he will not come back. So there is a lot of different between these two prophets. I didn’t call Jesus, God, you know my idea was ‘’He is a prophet but he is a prophet greater than Muhammad; so one day I went to my teacher, the one who taught me 10 years in Arabic college, and I ask him, teacher, how did God created the universe? Then he said God created the universe through the word,’’ THROUGH THE WORD. Then my question is: ‘’WORD’’ is creator or creation? He must clear this, my question is whether the WORD of God is creator or creation. Koran says Jesus is WORD of God. If my teacher says word of God is creator, which means Jesus is the creator, then muslim must become Christian suppose if he says the word is creation he will be trapped. You know why? He said everything was created through the word. Suppose if he said the word is creation, then how did God created the word? So he cannot say that the word is creator, or creation, so he was quite angry he push me out of his room and said word is not God, not creator or the creation you get out of here, ‘’he said

The reason why Muslim doesn’t accept to be Christian is because they are blinded with the wrong teaching of their priest, Imam. They said that the word is creation they try to prove it wrongly…… they say the word is not creator, not the creation, but not God. And no creation also. They don’t equal with God, that all their problem. So when he said that I told my teacher, word is not the creator or the creation.’’ So, that is why Christian says the word is son of God. Then he told me if there is son for God, I must show him the wife of God. That without wife no chance of having a son then I showed him a portion from the Koran. Koran says that God can see without eyes, God can talk without tongue, God can hear without ears. It is writing in the Koran. I said if that is the case, so God can have a child without a wife. I took my Koran, I put it on my chest, and I said ‘’Allah’’, tell me what I should do because your Koran says Jesus is still alive, and Mohammad is no more. Tell me whom should I accept.’’ after my prayer I opened the Koran, I didn’t asked anyone, I asked only my Allah. When I opened Koran, I saw chapter 10 verses 94. You know what Koran says? It says if you have any doubt in this Koran which I give to you, go and read the Bible, or ask the people, those who read the Bible. The truth is already revealing that.

I beg all muslim to give their life to Christ because he is the only way to the kingdom of God. Please don’t perish like other muslims that is serving the god they do not know. I welcome you into Christ Jesus as you change your mind to accept him today. God bless you.

ANNOUNCEMENT to IGLESIA NI CRISTO® of Manalo! CATHOLICS GREW by 15,000,000 YEARLY!

Number of Catholics growing throughout the world

Woman praying at Catholic Church in Myanmar (AFP)

(Vatican Radio) The number of Catholics in the world has increased with growth registered across all five continents. The figures are taken by the Fides news agency from the latest edition of the Church’s Book of Statistics updated to 31 December 2012. These show that on that date the number of Catholics in the world stood at 1,228,621,000 with an overall increase of more than 15,000,000 compared to the previous year. The Americas and Africa registered the biggest increases followed by Asia, Europe and Oceania. The world percentage of Catholics stood at 17.49 %, a decrease of 0.01% compared to the end of 2011.

The total number of priests in the world increased by 895 to 414,313. Europe once again registered the largest decrease (-1,375) followed by the Americas (-90) and Oceania (-80). In Africa the number of priests grew by 1,076 and in Asia by 1,364.

There was an overall decrease in the number of women religious worldwide, whose numbers dropped by 10,677 to 702,529. Once again Africa and Asia showed increases whilst Europe and the Americas showed the biggest decrease in the number of women religious.

The number of lay missionaries in the world is 362,488 with an overall decrease of 19,234.

In the field of education, the Catholic Church runs 71,188 kindergartens, 95,246 primary schools and 43,783 secondary schools. Charity and healthcare centres in the world run by the Church are 115,352.

EZEQUEL RAMIL LAGAZO, ganito ang mga inaralan ng IGLESIA NI CRISTO®

Iba talaga ang INARALAN ng tunay na sugo sa PEKENG SUGO.

Pati ba naman ang VERSE ng BIBLE na NAPAKALINAW ay MALABO pa rin sa kanila?

Isang MALAKING LAMAT ang meron sa inaralan ng mga Ministro ng Iglessia Ni Cristo® ang TANGGIHAN ang DAKILANG KATOTOHANG ito.

Hindi lang KALUNUS-LUNOS ang SASAPITIN ng kaluluwa ng taong ito kundi maging ang mga MINISTRO ng INC™ ni MANALO ang MANANAGOT.

Heto ang sabi ng BIBLIA mula sa MATEO 18:6-7 sa mga Ministrong pinanggalingan ng MALING ARAL:

"Mas mabuti pa sa isang tao ang siya'y bitinan sa leeg ng isang malaking gilingang-bato at ihulog sa kailaliman ng dagat kaysa siya'y maging sanhi ng pagkakasala ng isa sa maliliit na ito na nananampalataya sa akin.  Kahabag-habag ang daigdig sa dami ng mga tuksong nagiging sanhi ng pagkakasala! Hindi nga maiiwasan ang pagdating ng tukso, ngunit kakila-kilabot ang sasapitin ng taong pinanggagalingan nito. 

At kung bakit ko sinabi  na MALING ARAL ang NAGTATAKWIL ng PAGKA-DIOS ni CRISTO ay sapagkat ito ang BABALA ni APOSTOL JUAN ukol sa PAGDATING ng ARAL ng ANTI-CRISTO at MANLILINLANG mula sa 2 JUAN 1:7

Sapagkat nagkalat sa sanlibutan ang mga mandaraya! Ayaw nilang kilalanin na si Jesu-Cristo'y naging tao. Ang ganoong mga tao ay mandaraya at laban kay Cristo.

Ayun pala.

Nagkalat raw sa SANLIBUTAN ang mga MANDARAYA.

Sino ang mga MANDARAYA at mga ANTI-CRISTO?

Ang mga MANGANGARAL na AYAW KILALANIN si JESUS na [DIOS] na NAGKATAWANG-TAO. Katulad ng mga MANGANGARAL na MINISTRO ng IGLESIA NI CRISTO® de MANALO!

Mga BAYARANG MANGGAGAWA! Nangangaral lamang DAHIL BAYAD na BAYAD sila ng mga MANALO!

Dahil kung TAO LAMANG si CRISTO eh BAKIT pa ba kailangang MAGKATAWANG-TAO ang ISANG TAO na?!

Heto ang PATOTOO ulit ni APOSTOL JUAN ukol sa PAGKATAWANG-TAO ni JESU-CRISTO sa JUAN 1:1-5;14

Nang pasimula ay naroon na ang Salita; ang Salita ay kasama ng Diyos, at ang Salita ay Diyos. Sa pasimula ay kasama na siya ng Diyos. Nilikha ang lahat ng bagay sa pamamagitan niya, at walang anumang nalikha nang hindi sa pamamagitan niya. Ang nilikha sa kanya ay may buhay, a at ang buhay ay siyang ilaw ng sangkatauhan. Nagliliwanag sa kadiliman ang ilaw, at hindi ito nagapi kailanman ng kadiliman...

Ang Salita ay naging tao at nanirahan sa piling namin. Nakita namin ang kaluwalhatiang tunay na kanya bilang kaisa-isang Anak ng Ama. Siya ay puspos ng kagandahang-loob at ng katotohanan.

Ang paliwanag naman ng mga low-IQ na mga Ministro ng INC™, ang SALITA raw ay PANUKALA.

Wala pa raw si CRISTO noon sapagkat PLANO pa lamang daw ito ng DIOS kaya SALITA raw ang PAGKATAWAG sa kanya.

Eh bakit ang sabi sa 2 Juan 1:7 ay JESU-CRISTO raw ang NAGKATAWANG-TAO at HINDI PANUKALA o PLANO lamang!

Sapagkat nagkalat sa sanlibutan ang mga mandaraya! Ayaw nilang kilalanin na si Jesu-Cristo'y [ANG SALITA] naging tao. Ang ganoong mga tao ay mandaraya at laban kay Cristo.

 

Kaya MALINAW na MALINAW ang PAGLALAHAD ni APOSTOL JUAN kung sino ang mga MANDARAYA at mga ANTI-CRISTO ang mga mangangaral na Ministro ng INC™ ni Manalo na HINDI TUMATANGGAP na si CRISTO ay NAGKATAWANG-TAO!

Ang kabobohan ay hindi ito kina-career!

Pero sa INC™ ni Manalo, ito ay isang propesyon!

Mantakin niyo, NANINIWALA pala silang dios ang mga larawan at mga imahe ng mga santo't banal?

Ayaw sa rebulto pero MAY REBULTO naman si FELIX MANALO sa Central at INAALAYAN pa ng BULAKLAK ang kanyang imahe na animo'y BUHAY kung siya'y (rebulto) ay ITURING.

Source: Know The Truth

Noong panahon pa ng kanilang sugu-suguang si FELIX MANALO, mahigpit niyang pinagbabawal ang pagkakaroon ng mga rebulto.  

Hindi niya alam na sa panahon ng kanyang KAHALILING si ERAÑO MANALO eh sila rin pala ay GAGAWA rin ng mga bagay-bagay na HINDI man lang ITINURO ng yumaong KA FELIX.

Kung hindi ba naman sila SAKSAKAN ng KAIPOKRITUHAN eh! 

Hindi ba't MAS MALAKING KAHANGALAN ang GINAGAWA mo ang isang bagay na sa alam mo ay MALI?

Ganyan ang mga INARALAN ng PEKENG SUGO.

Tinawag tayong mga "ANAK NG DIABLO" nitong KAANIB ng IGLESIA NI CRISTO®!

Pero HINDI na bago ito sa atin.

Mas matindi pa nga ang pagkasabi ng kanilang PEKENG SUGO at nang kanyang mga BAYARANG MINISTRO!

PASUGO Disyembre 1965, p. 5:

“Kaninong Ministro kung ganyan ang mga Paring Katoliko? Mga Ministro ni Satanas na Diablo."

PASUGO Oktubre 1959, p. 5:

“Mga magdaraya at anti-Cristo, ang mga nagtuturong si Cristo ay Dios."

PASUGO Agosto 1962, p. 9:

“Kaya ang tunay na anti-Cristo, ang mga Papa ng Iglesia Katolika Apostolika Romana. At ang tunay na ampon ng anti-Cristo ay ang mga Katoliko.”

PASUGO Oktubre 1956, p. 1:

“Ang Iglesia ni Cristo ay nagdaos ng pamamahayag sa Lunsod ng Davao. Nagsalita roon si Kapatid na Felix Manalo at ang kasama niyang mga Ministro. Ipinahayag doon ng mga nagsalita na ang Iglesia Katolika Romana ay hindi itinatag ni Cristo kundi itinatag ng Diablo."

Pero HINDI po tayo dapat na MALUNGKOT sapagkat ang sabi ng kanilang PAMUNUAN sa CENTRAL ay PATUNAY LAMANG daw po na TUNAY ang ISANG IGLESIA kung ito ay TINUTULIGSA!

PASUGO Nobyembre 1954, p. 2, 1:

“Hindi kailangang patunayan pa kung hindi tunay na Iglesia, kung ito'y kay Cristo o hindi. Ang pag-uusig na nagaganap sa INK, na siyang katuparan ng pinagpauna ng Panginoon ay siyang malinaw na katunayan na ang INK ay tunay na Iglesia at kay Cristo. Anu-ano ang mga kinathang kasinungalingan na ipinaparatang kay Jesus an nakasisirang puri! Hindi lamang nila sinasabing siya'y may demonyo, kundi pinaparatangang siya'y nauulol (Juan 15:20). Kung siya'y inusig tao man ay uusigin din. Ang pag-uusig sa Ulo at tagos hanggang sa katawan. Siya ang ulo, tayo ang mga sangkap, na siyang Iglesia."

At alin kaya ang TINUTUKOY nilang TUNAY NA INK?

Sila na rin ang NAGPATOTOO!

PASUGO Nobyembre 1940, p. 23:

“Iisa lamang ang tanging makapagtatayo ng Iglesiang magiging dapat sa Dios. Kung sino-- ang ating Panginoong Jesu-Cristo lamang! Sino mang tao-- maging marunong o mangmang, maging dakila o hamak-- ay walang karapatang magtayo ng Iglesia"

Si Cristo LAMANG daw ang may karapatang MAGTATAG ng isang IGLESIA!

PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 7:

“Ang tunay na INK ay iisa lamang. Ito ang Iglesiyang itinayo ni Cristo. Kung mayroon mang nagsisibangon ngayong mga Iglesia at sasabihing sila man ay Iglesia ni Cristo rin, ang mga ito ay hindi tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo kundi huwad lamang."

Kung ang isang IGLESIA raw ay sumulpot KAMAKAILAN lamang, iyon ay HUWAD LAMANG daw!

PASUGO Mayo 1954, p. 9:

“Alin ang tunay na Iglesia? Ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo sa Jerusalem."

At DAPAT eh sa JERUSALEM daw ito ITINATAG... eh paano na ang nag-umpisa sa Punta?

PASUGO Agosto-Setyembre 1964, p. 5

“Kailan napatala sa Pamahalaan o narehistro ang INK sa Pilipinas? Noong Hulyo 27, 1914. Tunay nga na sinasabi sa rehistro na si Kapatid na F. Manalo ang nagtatag ng INK."

Ayon pala! Ang INK sa Pilipinas ay si FELIX MANALO ay siyang NAGTATATAG! Dios ko po!

 

PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 7:

“Ang tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo ay iisa lamang, ito ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo. Kung mayroon mang nagsisibangon ngayong mga Iglesia at sasabihing sila man ay INK rin ang mga ito ay hindi tunay kundi huwad lamang!"

Ayon sa kanilang PAMANTAYAN ng TUNAY sa HUWAD? Kung aling IGLESIA ang BAGONG SULPOT!

At dahil sa PATOTOONG yan, may NAG-IISANG TUNAY na IGLESIA!

PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46: 

“Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo."

At bilang pangwakas, kayo na ang bahalang umunawa sa mga nasusulat sa kanilang PASUGO!

PASUGO Agosto 1971, p.22:

“Tinitindigan namin na ang Iglesiang itinatag ni Cristo ay talagang iisa lamang. Nang magkaroon ng INK sa Pilipinas ay wala na ang Iglesia ni Cristo sa Jerusalem.”

Ang ibig nilang palitawin dito, ay noong 1914, ay nawala na ang itinayo ni Cristo. Bueno, tingnan natin ang bagay na ito, sapagkat may isang banggit na nasusulat sa PASUGO, Abril 1966, p. 46:

“Ang totoo hanggang sa kasalukuyan ay patuloy na ginagawa ni Satanas ang pagpapasok ng mga maling aral sa Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula'y siyang Iglesia ni Cristo. Sadyang matalino at tuso ang diablo. Hindi niya ginawang biglaan ang pagtalikod sa Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo noong unang siglo."

So NATALIKOD ba ang TUNAY na IGLESIA-- ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA?

SILA-SILA nagsisinungalingan sa isa't-isa.  DINARAYA nila ang bawat isa. 

Mga MANLILINLANG at mga ANTI-CRISTO!

Sila na rin ang SUMAGOT sa tanong natin! Salamat PASUGO!

[Basahin: ANG KATOTOHANAN TUNGKOL SA INK-1914]