THE CONFUSION CAUSED BY RAMIL PARBA USING HEBREW TEXT OF GENESIS 23:6 TO SHOW THE GREEK WORD, THEOS IN THE THIRD CLAUSE OF JOHN 1:1 IS NOT A NOUN BUT AN ADJECTIVE

Ni Kapatid na Duane

We can see in this video that Parba found it very difficult to distort the Bible verses using his questionable knowledge of biblical languages.

Since his explanation of John 1:1 is wrong, no New Testament scholar will agree with him that the Greek word "Theos" in John 1:1 is an adjective. He used the verse from the Old Testament where the Hebrew word, "נְשִׂיא אֱלֹהִים" or "mighty prince" in English was compared to the 3rd clause of John 1:1 "and the Word was God".

IF UNDERSTANDING OF HEBREW TEXT IS WRONG, WHAT MORE IF IT IS ABOUT SYNTAX?

When Ramil Parba read Genesis 23:6, we noticed he read the word, אֲדֹנִי (Adoni) as Adonay so he referred to Abraham as God. He was wrong from the start.

Is it right to use the Hebrew Word "נְשִׂיא אֱלֹהִים" or "n'si Elohim" from Genesis 23:6 to show that the Greek word Theos in the 3rd clause of John 1:1 is an adjective?

He used the Hebrew syntax since he wanted to rectify his wrong understanding about the Greek syntax?

שְׁמָעֵנוּ אֲדֹנִי, נְשִׂיא אֱלֹהִים אַתָּה בְּתוֹכֵנוּ--בְּמִבְחַר קְבָרֵינוּ, קְבֹר אֶת-מֵתֶךָ; אִישׁ מִמֶּנּוּ, אֶת-קִבְרוֹ לֹא-יִכְלֶה מִמְּךָ מִקְּבֹר מֵתֶךָ.

(Genesis 23:6, Hebrew Bible)

First of all, Elohim is not an adjective in Genesis 23:6. As usual, think context. Genesis is an ancient narrative, in Hebrew, written in the sixth or fifth century BCE, in formal courtly language: “a prince of God.” As opposed to ancient narrative, John (half a millennium later) is making a solemn claim, in Greek, that Jesus is God and co-eternal with God. The Hebrew and the Greek cannot be compared on equal terms. The Hittites (polytheists!) are not thinking John's "God."

John specifically and dramatically is claiming that Jesus IS GOD.

John 1:1 is Greek, while Genesis 23:6 is Hebrew; so the rules of syntax are somewhat different.

Greek syntax works different than Hebrew syntax.

Ramil Parba is trying to confuse the issue by appealing to Hebrew syntax as a way to refute a point of Greek syntax.

That would be like suggesting a point in Spanish syntax could illumine an issue in French syntax—mixing apples and oranges.

The question about the syntax in John 1:1 is Greek, so the only kind of syntactical parallels that will count must be in Greek.

REFUTING RAMIL PARBA ON JOHN 1:1 by Bro. Duane

By Bro. Duane

Let us analyze in detail. This will only show that his assessment is very inappropriate.

Ramil Parba (INC Minister) said: Kaya nang suriin ito ng mga nagsipagsuri ito ang sinasabi nila about the function of the term theos or God in the third clause of John 1:1, ito ang ating mababasa sa, The Fourth Gospel: Its Significance & Environment sa page 99:

"The closing words of v.1 should be translated, 'the Logos was divine.' Here the word theos has no article, thus giving it the significance of an adjective."

My Response: We saw Ramil Parba quote the book, “The Fourth Gospel: Its Significance & Environment” which is on page 99.

Is that really written on page 99 of said book?

This is page 99 of the book mentioned by Ramil Parba.

"about the purifiying is connected with baptism, and we do know exactly what form it would take. It is introduced only to to give the Baptist the opportunity of declaring again his subordination to Jesus. The disciples of John endeavour to rouse in their master jealousy of Jesus. Probably the dispute was as to whethere Jesus baptism or John's was the more effective. vv. 31-36 are a comment and reflection of the Evangelist. All the ideas are most with elsewhere, in the other parts of the Gospel. They are suggested by the Baptist's wods in Ἐν, 27-30. "(The Fourth Gospel: Its Significance & Environment”, page 99.)

It is clear that it is not written in page 99!

--------------------------------------------------------------

Ramil Parba (INC Minister) said: The term "GOD" or "Theos" in John 1:1 doesn't function as NOUN but it does function as Adjective. That is a predicative adjective and it is not a predicative nominative. the Word Was GOD. "The" is an Article. "WORD" is the subject of the clause "was" is a linking verb. "GOD" this is predicative adjective. So the "GOD" is predicative adjective because of the absence of the article."

Is it correct? No! It was very, very WRONG!

Let us answer what he said one-by-one.

Ramil Parba (INC Minister) said: The term "GOD" or "Theos" in John 1:1 doesn't function as NOUN but it does function as Adjective."

My Response: This is incorrect. Theos is a noun. While adjectives (like “good,” “bad,” etc) can function in a number of ways, nouns always function as nouns (substantives). Liddell and Scott, An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon, present no evidence of the use of θεὸς as an adjective, as follows: ὁ θεὸς, “God, in a general sense, θεὸς δώσει “God will give,” and in a particular sense, θεὸς τις “a god.” The noun, θεὸς, thus does not require a definite article to function as a noun, as follows: πρὸς θεῶν “by the gods.”

Ramil Parba (INC Minister) said: That is a predicative adjective and it is not a predicative nominative. the Word Was God.

My Response: This is a misunderstanding of what a “predicate adjective” is. A predicate adjective is an adjective acting substantially (like a noun) in the predicate position. This happens when nouns or adjectives are working with equative verbs (like “was” here).

--------------------------------------------------------------

Ramil Parba (INC Minister) said: Kaya nga naninindigan tayo at sinasang-ayunan yan ng ibang mga bible scholars, in fact even in the Greek Grammar talagang yung sabihin na logos dyan without the article sabi nila it functions as adjective at hindi po a noun or hindi po nominative in form.

Ramil Parba used the book of Professor Daniel B. Wallace, the Greek Grammar beyond the basics and quoted Page 269 which states.

“Such an option does not at all impugn the deity of Christ. Rather, it stresses that, although the person of Christ is not the person of the Father, their essence is identical. Possible translations are as follows:"What God was, the Word was (NEB), or "the Word was divine" (a modified Moffatt). In this second translation, "divine" is acceptable only if it is a term that can be applied only to true deity. However, in modern English, we use it with reference to angels, theologians, even meal. Thus "divine could be misleading in an English Translation. (Page 269, Greek Grammar beyond the basics, Daniel B. Wallace)”

My Response: What is the comment of a renowned New Testament scholar about this?

"I was shocked to learn that InC ministers had used my Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics in support of their heterodox beliefs."(Dr. Daniel B. Wallace, Author of Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics)

--------------------------------------------------------------

Ramil Parba (INC Minister) said: Pero maliwanag dito sa sinasabi nila na the word was divine, ang sabi nila e yun ang mas angkop na pagkakasalin tulad ng binanggit nya na salin ni James Moffatt.

"The Logos existed in the very beginning, the Logos was with God, the Logos was divine."(John 1:1, James Moffatt Version)

My Response: What does the New Testament Scholar, Dr. Daniel Wallace said in his comment?

"Consequently, I have no problem translating it as ‘divine’ as long as we understand that only true deity is divine. "(Dr. Daniel B. Wallace, Author of Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics)

Now, here is my question: Is James Moffatt against Christ being God?

This is the information about James Moffatt.

James Moffatt was an orthodox Trinitarian who supported the Nicene Creed and Chalcedon Confession:

"The Word was God...And the Word became flesh,' simply means "The word was divine...And the Word became human.' The Nicene faith, in the Chalcedon definition, was intended to conserve both of these truths against theories that failed to present Jesus as truly God and truly man..." Moffatt, Jesus Christ the Same, (Abingdon-Cokesbury), 1945, p.61.

Moffatt apparently did believe that "divine" signified that Jesus was "one and the same God" with ho theos.

A Challenge of Bro. Duane to INC's Top Defender Mr. Jose Ventilacion!

My Message for Joe Ventilacion (INC™) Regarding His Education At Harvard University

Source: The Splendor of the Church Blog

When Kuya Adviser posted his article on his FB page, Ventilacion posted comments on his FB page about me. He said I was challenging him and asking questions about textual criticism and that I have to study more about this topic.

He is simply boasting that he studied at Harvard University. He posted this on his FB Page conspicuously.

I am just wondering who among bible and textual scholars from Harvard University favor the interpretation made by Jose Ventilacion.

I asked Dr. Eugene Ulrich, a former professor at Harvard University who among his colleagues do not agree with King Cyrus referring to “Bird of Prey” in Isaiah 46:11. It is clear that Ventilacion does not concur with this and instead, he makes it appear that Felix Manalo is the one just like what his Church is doing.

Here is the email response of Dr. Eugene Ulrich:

By the way, Dr. Eugene Ulrich is one of my mentors in Biblical Languages.

Now, you studied at Harvard but you did not follow your professors and mentors in textual criticism who said explicitly that Cyrus is really being referred to as the Bird of Prey in Isaiah 46:11 and yet, it is Manalo whom you are pointing at.

It is clear you studied at Harvard University not to learn from the experts and it is not for you to boast about it. So, you do not follow what you learned.

You attended the SBL Annual Meeting and you were given the go-signal by your Executive Minister, Eduardo V. Manalo.

If it was Dr. James Richard Saley who delivered the lecture and you attended that, participated and listened; is it not a slap on your face as a result of what is written in your Pasugo Magazine?

I asked Dr. Eugene Ulrich if he knows Dr. James Richard Saley. Dr. Eugene Ulrich told me they are good friends and he presumes Dr. Saley is a Protestant.

Does Dr. James Richard Saley know that you taught your listeners that Felix Manalo is the Bird of Prey in Isaiah 46:11? Can you ask him if he agrees with your interpretation? 🙂

So, Joe Ventilacion listened to a Protestant whom you addressed as Devil. And, you studied at Harvard University wherein some professors are Protestants.

I give you 2 weeks to answer my post at splendor that INC members can read. I pray that you will be enlightened as well as them someday or they will soon realize your false teachings.

Answer the following because you studied textual criticism at Harvard University:

1. Who are the Bible Professors and Textual Scholars from Harvard University favor your interpretation that Felix Manalo is the Bird of Prey in Isaiah 46:11?
2. Who are the textual scholars from Harvard University who taught you that you translated Mizrach in Isaiah 43:5 of Aleppo Codex as “Far East”? Give me the names of at least 3 textual scholars.
3. Who are the textual scholars from Harvard University whom you can prove translated the Greek word (Logos) in John 1:1 to “idea” as you did?
4. Who are the textual scholars (at least three) from Harvard University who can give testimonies that your LAMSA Translation is Accurate?

I will wait for your reply, Joe Ventilacion.

And, if you are boasting that we need to square off in a debate, do not give me any conditions that I should pay for the venue rental since there are many public venues which are free.

Just tell me when and I will submit my proposal to the nearest INC Local.

Prove that the LAMSA is accurate using Greek text and testimonies of Aramaic scholars if you are really intelligent in textual criticism and that I still need to study.

Sincerely,

Bro. Duane

Kaanib pa ba ng Iglesia Ni Cristo-1914 si Conrad J. Obligacion? Bakit nawala na lamang ang kanyang Resbak.com?

Matagal nang hindi naririnig ang pangalan ni Conrad J. Obligacion sa mga forums at blogs ng mga INC™. Nawala na rin ang kanyang RESBAK.com sa internet.  Tanging natira na lamang ay ang mga blogs na SIYA ANG MAY AKDA na pinangalan sa mga Catholic Faith Defenders, hindi para ipagmamapuri ang kanilang gawaing pangkabanalan kundi sa paninirang-puri at atake sa Iglesia Katolika na siyang TUNAY at NAG-IISANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO (ASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46). Alin man sa dalawa iyan ang expertise niya. (Basahin "Ang Katotohanan Tungkol sa INK-1914" na inilathala ng Logos Publication.

Hindi kaya nadismaya rin siya sa lumalalang sigalot sa loob ng Iglesia Ni Cristo® sa pagitan ng pamilya ng kasalukuyang Punong Ministro ang Ka Eduardo V. Manalo laban sa kanyang kadugo at kapamilya ang Ka Eraño G. Manalo na kanyang ama, inang si Ka Tenny, at mga kapatid sa laman na sina Ka Lottie, Ka Angel at iba pa.  

Hindi kaya siya ay lumaban sa pamamahala ng kasalukuyang Punong Ministro kaya't siya ay tumahimik at kasama na ngayon sa mga "INC Defenders" na sikretong lumalaban kay EVM? 

Alin man doon, sana naman ay napagtanto niya na ang kasamaan ay walang puwang sa kaharian ng Diyos. Na ang pandaraya, pagsisinungaling, panlilinlang sa kahit sinong tao, Kristiano man o hinde ay hindi katangian ng isang taong matuwid at nagnanais na mapasa-Diyos at hindi katanggap-tanggap sa isang nagnanais na taga-sunod ni Cristo.  

Hindi natin ninais na may masamang nangyari sa isang dating tagapag-pahamak ng Iglesia Katolikang katulad niya, ngunit dahil naglipana na naman ang paninirang-puri ng mga kaaway sa pananampalataya at mga kakampi ngunit kaaway sa pulitika kaya't minabuti kong i-refresh ulit ang tungkol sa  kasaysayan ng galit ni G. Obligacion sa mga Catholic Faith Defenders mula nang ito ay nagsimulang mamayagpag taong 2008 sa pangunguna ni Rev. Fr. Abrahan 'Abe' Arganiosa, Bro. Cenon Bibe at marami pang mga tagapagtanggol.  

Sa kasalukuyan, malakas, buhay, namamayagpag at aktibong nag-aaral ng PAGTATANGGOL sa INANG SIMBAHAN ang maraming kabataang Katoliko mula Mindanao hanggang Luzon, sa pangangasiwa nina Fr. Abe Arganiosa, Atty. Bro Marwill Llasos, OP, Bro. Cenon Bibe, Bro. 'Tatang" Larry Mallari na dating kaanib ng INC™, Bro. Duane, Bro. Marco Evangelista, etc.  

Tunay nga na hindi kayang patahimikin ng mga kalaban ng Santa Iglesia ang mga Katoliko. Sila ay pinatitibay at pinalalakas ng Banal na Espiritu ang mga LINGKOD niya! Kung hindi kayang manindigan ng mga lingkod sino ang magtatanggol sa Inang Simbahan? Kung mananahimik tayo, mga bato na mismo ang magsasalita (Lk. 19:40). 

At para sa kabatiran ng mga nagsusubaybay sa blog na ito, ating basahing muli ang PANLILINLANG NI CONRAD J. OBLIGACION na isa sa mga tumutuligsa sa mga 'Defenders" at ng Inang Simbahan, upang maunawaan natin kung ano ang nagtulak sa kanya upang magsinungaling, mandaya, at manlinlang ng mga kaluluwa.

Narito rin ang artikulo ni Bro. Cenon Bible patungkol kay G. Obligacion sa TUMBUKIN NATIN.

Heto naman ang artikulo mul sa FILIPINO CULTS patungkol din kay G. Obligacion.

Heto naman ang artikolong sinulat sa blog ni Fr. Abe Arganiosa The Splendor of the Church. 

Maraming salamat po.

EZEQUEL RAMIL LAGAZO, ganito ang mga inaralan ng IGLESIA NI CRISTO®

Iba talaga ang INARALAN ng tunay na sugo sa PEKENG SUGO.

Pati ba naman ang VERSE ng BIBLE na NAPAKALINAW ay MALABO pa rin sa kanila?

Isang MALAKING LAMAT ang meron sa inaralan ng mga Ministro ng Iglessia Ni Cristo® ang TANGGIHAN ang DAKILANG KATOTOHANG ito.

Hindi lang KALUNUS-LUNOS ang SASAPITIN ng kaluluwa ng taong ito kundi maging ang mga MINISTRO ng INC™ ni MANALO ang MANANAGOT.

Heto ang sabi ng BIBLIA mula sa MATEO 18:6-7 sa mga Ministrong pinanggalingan ng MALING ARAL:

"Mas mabuti pa sa isang tao ang siya'y bitinan sa leeg ng isang malaking gilingang-bato at ihulog sa kailaliman ng dagat kaysa siya'y maging sanhi ng pagkakasala ng isa sa maliliit na ito na nananampalataya sa akin.  Kahabag-habag ang daigdig sa dami ng mga tuksong nagiging sanhi ng pagkakasala! Hindi nga maiiwasan ang pagdating ng tukso, ngunit kakila-kilabot ang sasapitin ng taong pinanggagalingan nito. 

At kung bakit ko sinabi  na MALING ARAL ang NAGTATAKWIL ng PAGKA-DIOS ni CRISTO ay sapagkat ito ang BABALA ni APOSTOL JUAN ukol sa PAGDATING ng ARAL ng ANTI-CRISTO at MANLILINLANG mula sa 2 JUAN 1:7

Sapagkat nagkalat sa sanlibutan ang mga mandaraya! Ayaw nilang kilalanin na si Jesu-Cristo'y naging tao. Ang ganoong mga tao ay mandaraya at laban kay Cristo.

Ayun pala.

Nagkalat raw sa SANLIBUTAN ang mga MANDARAYA.

Sino ang mga MANDARAYA at mga ANTI-CRISTO?

Ang mga MANGANGARAL na AYAW KILALANIN si JESUS na [DIOS] na NAGKATAWANG-TAO. Katulad ng mga MANGANGARAL na MINISTRO ng IGLESIA NI CRISTO® de MANALO!

Mga BAYARANG MANGGAGAWA! Nangangaral lamang DAHIL BAYAD na BAYAD sila ng mga MANALO!

Dahil kung TAO LAMANG si CRISTO eh BAKIT pa ba kailangang MAGKATAWANG-TAO ang ISANG TAO na?!

Heto ang PATOTOO ulit ni APOSTOL JUAN ukol sa PAGKATAWANG-TAO ni JESU-CRISTO sa JUAN 1:1-5;14

Nang pasimula ay naroon na ang Salita; ang Salita ay kasama ng Diyos, at ang Salita ay Diyos. Sa pasimula ay kasama na siya ng Diyos. Nilikha ang lahat ng bagay sa pamamagitan niya, at walang anumang nalikha nang hindi sa pamamagitan niya. Ang nilikha sa kanya ay may buhay, a at ang buhay ay siyang ilaw ng sangkatauhan. Nagliliwanag sa kadiliman ang ilaw, at hindi ito nagapi kailanman ng kadiliman...

Ang Salita ay naging tao at nanirahan sa piling namin. Nakita namin ang kaluwalhatiang tunay na kanya bilang kaisa-isang Anak ng Ama. Siya ay puspos ng kagandahang-loob at ng katotohanan.

Ang paliwanag naman ng mga low-IQ na mga Ministro ng INC™, ang SALITA raw ay PANUKALA.

Wala pa raw si CRISTO noon sapagkat PLANO pa lamang daw ito ng DIOS kaya SALITA raw ang PAGKATAWAG sa kanya.

Eh bakit ang sabi sa 2 Juan 1:7 ay JESU-CRISTO raw ang NAGKATAWANG-TAO at HINDI PANUKALA o PLANO lamang!

Sapagkat nagkalat sa sanlibutan ang mga mandaraya! Ayaw nilang kilalanin na si Jesu-Cristo'y [ANG SALITA] naging tao. Ang ganoong mga tao ay mandaraya at laban kay Cristo.

 

Kaya MALINAW na MALINAW ang PAGLALAHAD ni APOSTOL JUAN kung sino ang mga MANDARAYA at mga ANTI-CRISTO ang mga mangangaral na Ministro ng INC™ ni Manalo na HINDI TUMATANGGAP na si CRISTO ay NAGKATAWANG-TAO!

Ang kabobohan ay hindi ito kina-career!

Pero sa INC™ ni Manalo, ito ay isang propesyon!

Mantakin niyo, NANINIWALA pala silang dios ang mga larawan at mga imahe ng mga santo't banal?

Ayaw sa rebulto pero MAY REBULTO naman si FELIX MANALO sa Central at INAALAYAN pa ng BULAKLAK ang kanyang imahe na animo'y BUHAY kung siya'y (rebulto) ay ITURING.

Source: Know The Truth

Noong panahon pa ng kanilang sugu-suguang si FELIX MANALO, mahigpit niyang pinagbabawal ang pagkakaroon ng mga rebulto.  

Hindi niya alam na sa panahon ng kanyang KAHALILING si ERAÑO MANALO eh sila rin pala ay GAGAWA rin ng mga bagay-bagay na HINDI man lang ITINURO ng yumaong KA FELIX.

Kung hindi ba naman sila SAKSAKAN ng KAIPOKRITUHAN eh! 

Hindi ba't MAS MALAKING KAHANGALAN ang GINAGAWA mo ang isang bagay na sa alam mo ay MALI?

Ganyan ang mga INARALAN ng PEKENG SUGO.

Tinawag tayong mga "ANAK NG DIABLO" nitong KAANIB ng IGLESIA NI CRISTO®!

Pero HINDI na bago ito sa atin.

Mas matindi pa nga ang pagkasabi ng kanilang PEKENG SUGO at nang kanyang mga BAYARANG MINISTRO!

PASUGO Disyembre 1965, p. 5:

“Kaninong Ministro kung ganyan ang mga Paring Katoliko? Mga Ministro ni Satanas na Diablo."

PASUGO Oktubre 1959, p. 5:

“Mga magdaraya at anti-Cristo, ang mga nagtuturong si Cristo ay Dios."

PASUGO Agosto 1962, p. 9:

“Kaya ang tunay na anti-Cristo, ang mga Papa ng Iglesia Katolika Apostolika Romana. At ang tunay na ampon ng anti-Cristo ay ang mga Katoliko.”

PASUGO Oktubre 1956, p. 1:

“Ang Iglesia ni Cristo ay nagdaos ng pamamahayag sa Lunsod ng Davao. Nagsalita roon si Kapatid na Felix Manalo at ang kasama niyang mga Ministro. Ipinahayag doon ng mga nagsalita na ang Iglesia Katolika Romana ay hindi itinatag ni Cristo kundi itinatag ng Diablo."

Pero HINDI po tayo dapat na MALUNGKOT sapagkat ang sabi ng kanilang PAMUNUAN sa CENTRAL ay PATUNAY LAMANG daw po na TUNAY ang ISANG IGLESIA kung ito ay TINUTULIGSA!

PASUGO Nobyembre 1954, p. 2, 1:

“Hindi kailangang patunayan pa kung hindi tunay na Iglesia, kung ito'y kay Cristo o hindi. Ang pag-uusig na nagaganap sa INK, na siyang katuparan ng pinagpauna ng Panginoon ay siyang malinaw na katunayan na ang INK ay tunay na Iglesia at kay Cristo. Anu-ano ang mga kinathang kasinungalingan na ipinaparatang kay Jesus an nakasisirang puri! Hindi lamang nila sinasabing siya'y may demonyo, kundi pinaparatangang siya'y nauulol (Juan 15:20). Kung siya'y inusig tao man ay uusigin din. Ang pag-uusig sa Ulo at tagos hanggang sa katawan. Siya ang ulo, tayo ang mga sangkap, na siyang Iglesia."

At alin kaya ang TINUTUKOY nilang TUNAY NA INK?

Sila na rin ang NAGPATOTOO!

PASUGO Nobyembre 1940, p. 23:

“Iisa lamang ang tanging makapagtatayo ng Iglesiang magiging dapat sa Dios. Kung sino-- ang ating Panginoong Jesu-Cristo lamang! Sino mang tao-- maging marunong o mangmang, maging dakila o hamak-- ay walang karapatang magtayo ng Iglesia"

Si Cristo LAMANG daw ang may karapatang MAGTATAG ng isang IGLESIA!

PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 7:

“Ang tunay na INK ay iisa lamang. Ito ang Iglesiyang itinayo ni Cristo. Kung mayroon mang nagsisibangon ngayong mga Iglesia at sasabihing sila man ay Iglesia ni Cristo rin, ang mga ito ay hindi tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo kundi huwad lamang."

Kung ang isang IGLESIA raw ay sumulpot KAMAKAILAN lamang, iyon ay HUWAD LAMANG daw!

PASUGO Mayo 1954, p. 9:

“Alin ang tunay na Iglesia? Ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo sa Jerusalem."

At DAPAT eh sa JERUSALEM daw ito ITINATAG... eh paano na ang nag-umpisa sa Punta?

PASUGO Agosto-Setyembre 1964, p. 5

“Kailan napatala sa Pamahalaan o narehistro ang INK sa Pilipinas? Noong Hulyo 27, 1914. Tunay nga na sinasabi sa rehistro na si Kapatid na F. Manalo ang nagtatag ng INK."

Ayon pala! Ang INK sa Pilipinas ay si FELIX MANALO ay siyang NAGTATATAG! Dios ko po!

 

PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 7:

“Ang tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo ay iisa lamang, ito ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo. Kung mayroon mang nagsisibangon ngayong mga Iglesia at sasabihing sila man ay INK rin ang mga ito ay hindi tunay kundi huwad lamang!"

Ayon sa kanilang PAMANTAYAN ng TUNAY sa HUWAD? Kung aling IGLESIA ang BAGONG SULPOT!

At dahil sa PATOTOONG yan, may NAG-IISANG TUNAY na IGLESIA!

PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46: 

“Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo."

At bilang pangwakas, kayo na ang bahalang umunawa sa mga nasusulat sa kanilang PASUGO!

PASUGO Agosto 1971, p.22:

“Tinitindigan namin na ang Iglesiang itinatag ni Cristo ay talagang iisa lamang. Nang magkaroon ng INK sa Pilipinas ay wala na ang Iglesia ni Cristo sa Jerusalem.”

Ang ibig nilang palitawin dito, ay noong 1914, ay nawala na ang itinayo ni Cristo. Bueno, tingnan natin ang bagay na ito, sapagkat may isang banggit na nasusulat sa PASUGO, Abril 1966, p. 46:

“Ang totoo hanggang sa kasalukuyan ay patuloy na ginagawa ni Satanas ang pagpapasok ng mga maling aral sa Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula'y siyang Iglesia ni Cristo. Sadyang matalino at tuso ang diablo. Hindi niya ginawang biglaan ang pagtalikod sa Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo noong unang siglo."

So NATALIKOD ba ang TUNAY na IGLESIA-- ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA?

SILA-SILA nagsisinungalingan sa isa't-isa.  DINARAYA nila ang bawat isa. 

Mga MANLILINLANG at mga ANTI-CRISTO!

Sila na rin ang SUMAGOT sa tanong natin! Salamat PASUGO!

[Basahin: ANG KATOTOHANAN TUNGKOL SA INK-1914]

IGLESIA NI CRISTO-README: Si Cristo at Espiritu Santo ay "NANDOON NA SA SIMULA" kasama ng Dios

Here is what the Iglesia Ni Cristo®'s position on Jesus' pre-existence.

"Many believe that Christ is God who pre-existed before being born on Earth. However, such a belief is based on erroneous interpretations of the Holy Bible." -INCMedia.org

Therefore, IglesiaNiCristoREADME, the only INC™ Defender in the blogsphere is UNBIBLICAL according to the management of the Iglesia Ni Cristo®, Incorporated. 

Thank you for clarifying.

INC™ member ang KRUS daw ay simbulo ni Satanas??

Taken from INC™ - Catholic Forum in Facebook "Catholic Church 33 A.D vs INC 1914 A.D."

Ginoong Gomez, alam mo ba ang mga pinagsasabi mo sa Forum? Aprobado ba ng pamunuan ng INC ang iyong mga binitiwang opinyon?

Ang mga sinabi mo ba ay ang kabuuan ng paniniwala sa loob ng INC™ ni Manalo? Tahasan mo bang inaamin na ika'y nagsasabi ng katotohanan ayon sa PANINIWALA ng buong Iglesia Ni Cristo®?

Sabi mo: "Dmo kc alam c Kristo nagtayo ng ng Iglesia noo. Pa pero bago cya napaku sa Krus sinabi na niya sa kanyang mga apostol. Na natalikod ang Iglesia dahil cla ay papatayin.at 22ong nangyari ito. Pero sinabi rn nya na ito ay muling babangon."

Nagugulat ako sa mga sinabi mo. Saan ba sinabi ni Jesus na "NATALIKOD ANG IGLESIA" (past tense)?

Ibig mo bang sabihin eh mamamatay pa lang si Cristo sa krus ay "NATALIKOD" na ang "IGLESIA"?

Maaari mo bang IBAHAGI sa amin kung SAAN ito NAKASULAT sa Biblia? Anong VERSION ng Biblia? Anong CHAPTER? Anong VERSE?

Kapag napatunayan mo 'yan, AANIB ako agad agad sa INC™ ni Manalo!

Sabi mo: "... ang krus ay simbulo ni satanas..."

Nasagot na po namin ito sa naunang artikulo na sinulat ko: "The "sign of the Cross is a mark of the Beast" says an Iglesia ni Cristo member"

Nakasulat ba ito sa Biblia?

At kung meron man, may sinabi ba talagang "ang krus" MISMO ay "SIMBULO ni satanas"?

Sabi niyo ung wala sa Biblia ay HINDI dapat paniwalaan?  Sige, hintay namin ang sagot mo para mapatunayan natin kung KARAPAT-DAPAT ka bang PANIWALAAN o hinde!

Very exciting itong naman ang napulot mong kaalaman. Ganito pala ang mga inaralan ng mga pekeng sugo!

Bagkos, ang sabi ng Biblia tungkol sa KRUS ay ganito: 1 Corinthians 1:17-23

"For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with the wisdom of human eloquence, so that the cross of Christ might not be emptied of its meaning.

"The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it (the CROSS) is the power of God. For it is written:“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,and the learning of the learned I will set aside.”

"Where is the wise one? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made the wisdom of the world foolish? For since in the wisdom of God the world did not come to know God through wisdom, it was the will of God through the foolishness of the proclamation to save those who have faith. For Jews demand signs and Greeks look for wisdom, but we proclaim Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles..."

Ang KRUS daw ay KAPANGYARIHAN NG DIOS sa mga katulad NAMING ILILIGTAS!!!

Sabi ng INC™ member: "Punta ka sa loob ng mga kapilya nmin kung may makita ka na mga rebulto. Pag may makita ka bigyan kita ng 10K."

Hindi naman usapin kung nasa loob o nasa labas ang isang imahe o rebulto. Yung rebulto ni FELIX MANALO sa LABAS ng inyong CENTRAL eh INAALAYAN pa ng BULAKLAK?

Ang rebulto ba ay BATO LAMANG? Bakit KAYO  NAG-AALAY ng bulaklak sa ISANG BATO? Hindi ba kayo mga TIMAWA't NAG-AALAY sa isang MUOG na YARI sa BATO?!

Mga IPOKRITO!

Acts 20:28: "Keep watch over yourselves and over the whole flock of which the holy Spirit has appointed you overseers  in which you tend the church of God that he acquired with his own blood."

Mga Gawa 20:28 "Ingatan ninyo ang inyong sarili at ang buong kawan, sapagkat sila'y inilagay ng Espiritu Santo sa inyong pag-iingat. Pangalagaan ninyo ang iglesya ng Diyos a na kanyang tinubos sa pamamagitan ng dugo ng kanyang Anak."

O nasaan ung "IGLESIA NI CRISTO" sa Mga Gawa? Wala naman ah...

Ah... sa Lamsa Translations siguro ang tinutukoy mo.  Di naman Tagalog ang Lamsa Bible ah!

Acts 20:28 (Lamsa) "Take heed therefore to yourselves and to all the flock over which the Holy Spirit has appointed you overseers, to feed the church of Christ which he has purchased with his blood."

Na mabilis namang ISINALIN ng mga Iglesia Ni Cristo® sa Tagalog para lalabas ang mga salitang IGLESIA NI CRISTO, patunay raw na NASA BIBLIA sila (and ni-capslock pa ang IGLESIA NI CRISTO sa Torch of Salvation Blog):  

Mga Gawa (salin ng mga INC™ sa Tagalog): "Ingatan ninyo kung gayon ang inyong mga sarili at ang buong kawan na rito’y hinirang kayo ng Espiritu Santo upang maging mga katiwala, upang pakanin ang IGLESIA NI CRISTO na binili niya ng kaniyang dugo.”

Bakit PINALITAN ni George Lamsa ang "church of God" sa "church of Christ" na siyang ikinatuwa ng mga kaanib ng INC™ ni Manalo? 

Sapagkat HINDI matanggap ni Lamsa na ang DIOS ay MAY DUGO. 

Hindi raw ito MAAARI sapagkat ang Dios ay walang dugo. Kaya't MAS ANGKOP daw kay "CRISTO" ang mga katagang: "...upang pakanin ang iglesia ni Cristo na binili niya ng KANYANG DUGO." Dugo raw ni Cristo 'yan at hindi ang Dios. 

Ganyan ang paniniwala kasi ni George Lamsa bilang kaanib ng ASSYRIAN CHURCH of the EAST (Sorry po mga INC™ hindi po sila aanib kahit kailan sa Iglesiang TATAG ni FELIX MANALO!).

Ano po ba kasi ang Assyrian Church of the East?

Sila po ay taga-sunod ng EREHENG si NESTOR o ng "NESTORIAN CHURCH".

Heto po ang sabi ng Wikipedia tungkol kay NESTOR at ang kanyang HERETIC THEOLOGY:

"Nestorius (386–450), Patriarch of Constantinople from 428–431. The doctrine, which was informed by Nestorius' studies under Theodore of Mopsuestia at the School of Antioch, emphasizes the disunion between the human and divine natures of Jesus. Nestorius' teachings brought him into conflict with some other prominent church leaders, most notably Cyril of Alexandria, who criticized especially his rejection of the title Theotokos ("Bringer forth of God") for the Virgin Mary. Nestorius and his teachings were eventually condemned as heretical at the First Council of Ephesus in 431 and the Council of Chalcedon in 451, leading to the Nestorian Schism in which churches supporting Nestorius broke with the rest of the Christian Church."

Kita niyo na? Ang LAMSA ay HINDI naniniwala sa pagka-DIOS ni Cristo kaya't hindi ito kataka-taka kay Ginoong Lamsa. 

Ngunit sa kasamaang-palad ay HINDI po UMANIB si Ginoong George Lamsa sa mga Iglesia Ni Cristo®. 

Romans 16:16 "Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you."

Ano raw?

Ang LAHAT daw ng mga iglesia ni Cristo (hindi Iglesia Ni Cristo) ay BUMABATI sa kanya? 

Hindi ba't ito'y SULAT ni Apostol San Pablo sa Iglesia sa Roma? 

Magkaiba po ang Iglesia sa Roma sa INC sa Roma! 

Ang Iglesiang tinutukoy ni Apostol San Pablo ay ang IGLESIA SA ROMA at HINDI po ang Local ng INC sa Roma. Ang Iglesia sa Roma ay NAROON pa rin sa Roma sa kasalukuyan. Ito ang NAG-IISA, BANAL, PANGKALAHATAN (CATHOLIC) at APOSTOLIKONG IGLESIA NI CRISTO sa Roma!

Sa katunayan, halos LAHAT NG BANSA na may Iglesia Katolika ay BUMABATI nga naman sa IGLESIA SA ROMA! Tunay nga na NATUPAD sa Iglesia Katolika ang sinasaad ng Roma 16:16 "... lahat ng mga iglesia ni Cristo ay bumabati SA INYO (Iglesia sa Roma at hindi sa Pinas!)."

Ang Local na INC sa Roma ay BUMABATI sa CENTRAL nila sa PILIPINAS at HINDI sa Roma.

Heto ang nakagaya sa Apocalipe o Revelations 13:16-18

"It forced all the people, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to be given a stamped image on their right hands or their foreheads[j]so that no one could buy or sell except one who had the stamped image of the beast’s name or the number that stood for its name.

"Wisdom is needed here; one who understands can calculate the number of the beast, for it is a number that stands for a person. His number is six hundred and sixty-six."

May nabasa ba kaming 'TANDA NG KRUS" sa Revelations 13? Wala naman ah.

Gawa-gawa lang kayo ng kwento palibhasa eh nag-aantanda kami ng Krus mula noo eh kami na yung pinapatungkulan ng Revelations 13... mga inaralan talaga kayo ng PEKENG SUGO!

Naku, alam na alam po namin yan. Sino naman ang Iglesia Ni Cristo® para aralan kami ng kasaysayan eh hirap pa kayong nakarating sa 100 Year Anniversary.

Pero ang HINDI namin alam ay kung SAAN ba SINABI  ni CRISTO na "NATALIKOD" ang Iglesia (past tense pa ha).  So BUHAY pa ang mga apostol ay "NATALIKOD" na ang Iglesia?

Heto ba ang mga sinasabi niyong SUMUSUNOD sa ARAL NG BIBLIA?

Mukhang hindi Biblia ang binabasa nito kundi nobela.

Di bale, di naman kami naniniwala sa mga sabi-sabi sapagkat ang sabi ni Cristo ay "HINDING-HINDI" raw po "MATATALIKOD" ang kanyang "IGLESIA".

Pangakong NAGKATOTOO!

Opo, 2,014 years na po ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA! Nakasulat po yan sa mga kalendaryong NAKASABIT sa inyong mga OPISINA sa CENTRAL OFFICE ng INC™.

Tuluyan nang NAGPAALAM ang tagong-Ministro ng INC Ni Manalo na si ReadMeINC

Bahagi ng artikulo ng taong Ministro ng INC ni Manalo kung saan siya'y tuluyang namaalam na

SA MGA TUMUTULIGSA SA IGLESIA:

Nagpapasalamat din ako dahil naging daan kayo para masagot ang mga tanong ng marami sa INC. Sa bawat pagtuligsa nyo at paghanap sa kasagutan, lalo kong napapatunayan na ang Iglesiang ito ay tunay na sa DIYOS. Maniwala man kayo o hindi, wala po akong personal na galit sa inyo. Kahit pa kay Mr. Abe Arganiosa na madalas gumawa ng kasinungalingan sa Iglesia, at sa iba pa. Kahit pa magkakaiba tayo ng paniniwala, pare pareho parin tayong Pilipino, kaya dapat walang personalan at siraan na nagaganap sa atin. Ipakita natin ang pagiging KRISTYANO natin, sa bawat kasamaan na ating ginagawa tandaan po natin, may ganti dyan ang Diyos, antayin na lang natin.

Talo! Kung baga sa isang laban ay sumuko siya agad!

'Yan lamang ang maaaring nag-impluwensiya kay ReadMeINC isang TAGONG MINISTRO ng INC Ni Manalo.  

Sabi niya wala raw siyang personal na galit kay "Mr. Abe Arganiosa" pero patutsada naman niyang inakusahang "nagsisinungaling" daw si Fr. Abe laban sa Iglesia ni Manalo.

Ang lakas ng loob niyang sabihing "wala po akong personal na galit" kay Fr. Abe.  

Sa katotohanan, sila, sa pagkatao ni ReadMeINC ang may PERSONAL NA GALIT kay Fr. Abe at sa iba pang mga CATHOLIC DEFENDERS sapagkat PERSONAL nila silang inaaway at GUMAGAWA pa nga ng mga BLOGS na gamit ang PERSONAL NA PANGALAN ng mga Catholic Defenders.

Gustuhin man ni Fr. Abe na MAMERSONAL sa mga kaanib ng INC ni Manalo pero NAGTATAGO naman sila sa mga PSEUDONYM tulad ni READMEINC.

Eh si CONRAD J. OBLIGACION, na may-ari ng RESBAK.COM, matapos MABUNYAG ang TUNAY niyang pangalan eh NADUWAG siyang mag-post ng kanyang PERSONAL NA LARAWAN samantalang pinagpipiestahan niya ang mga larawan ng mga kilalang mga Catholic Defenders.

Ang pagbubuking ng mga kaanib ng ADD sa pagkatao ni "Truthcaster" na si Conrad J. Obligacion

May KARUWAGAN ang mga "defenders" ng INC Ni Manalo sapagkat lumalaban sila ng PATAGO at PAILALIM.

Salamat naman sa pamunuan ng INC Ni Manalo at napagtanto niyong patahimikin ang inyong MINISTRO nagre-represent sa inyo ng PATAGO.

Sana, bigyan niyo rin ng leksiyon si CONRAD J. OBLIGACION na may ari ng RESBAK.com. Si ReadMe at si Conrad ay mga kahihiyan ng inyong samahan!

Paalam. Sana ang iyong pagpapaalam ay isang pagninilay na BABALIK KA SA IGLESIANG TATAG NI CRISTO-- ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA!

An Iglesia Ni Cristo Minister Ramil Parba Deceiving their followers

[Mula sa The Splendor of the Church]
Mapapanuod po natin sa videong ito na si Ramil Parba, isang ministro sa Iglesia ni Cristo 1914 ay gumamit ng isang reperensiya para lang tutulan ang isa sa mga talatang ginagamit ng mga naniniwalang ang Panginoong Jesu-Cristo ay Diyos, ang Juan 1:1.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEDXTOCN8go

Napanuod po natin na sinipi ni Ramil Parba ang librong, “The Fourth Gospel: Its Significance & Environment at nasa pahina 99 daw…

 

Ang tanong meron ba talagang nakasulat na ganyan sa pahina 99 ng nasabing libro?

Ito ngayon ang libro…

Tignan po natin sa pahina 99 kung totoo nga ang sinasabi ni Ramil Parba…

Malinaw po na wala sa pahina 99!

So, alam nyo na kung ano ang ibig sabihin nyan. :-)

INC® Defender's Desperate move to hack my account

Conrad J. Obligacion, a zealous defender of Manalo and his INC^® Church-- "Currently on assignment and based in Munich, Germany!". The same filthy man is the owner of www.resbak.com (resbak is a Filipino street language for 'pay back' or 'revenge'.) He is also owner of several fake blogs that carries the names of those critical of the INC^® church of Manalo! 

He is a minister of the Iglesia ni Cristo^® founded by Felix Manalo in 1914.

IGLESIA NI CRISTO® DEFENDER CONRAD J. OBLIGACION tried HACKING my account!

The notorious, filthy, evil IGLESIA NI CRISTO^® defender by the name CONRAD J. OBLIGACION has tried many times HACKING my account.

Bonafide INC^® ni Manalo-1914 member!

Why? Where is CONRAD J. OBLIGACION residing? According to him (Source: Tumbukin Natin)

"Currently on assignment and based in Munich, Germany!"

"...historically, the Roman Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back in the first century” because i do not recognize the RCC to be the Church of Christ" - ReadMe Iglesia ni Cristo Member

ReadMe is a bonafide member of the church founded by Felix Manalo in 1914. It's name is purely in Tagalog as it was a REGISTERED PATENTED TRADEMARK, a sole corporation owned and managed by the MANALO CLAN. ReadMe's response is typically an "Iglesia" that is almost evident in most of its members joining in forums. It's PAID MINISTERS authority is hanging while their credibility as "bible experts" cannot even recognized since NONE of its paid ministers are considered as such. Let's be patient with ReadMe and other members and pray for them that they may finally find light in the TRUE CHURCH OF CHRIST-- the ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC and APOSTOLIC CHURCH! -CD2000

This article was taken from The Splendor of the Church blog of Father Abe, my good friend.

ReadMe: Im just wondering why Catholic defenders CANT understand my point. frequently happens, like in the case of Catholicdefender2000. Was it my problem or there is a problem on how they understand things? Well never mind.

Sagot: I’m just wondering too why people like you are buying the idea that the church apostatized when, in fact, it is not supported in scripture. Anyways, don’t mind it because your problem is yours alone.

Iglesia ni Cristo Lies and Deceit Part 2

INC Deceit and Lies Part I

Taken from: Study Iglesia ni Cristo

Examine the Verse Philippians 2:9-11 This verse is claimed to provide the basis of the Iglesia ni Cristo belief that Jesus is not an ordinary man but a very special Man, who was sanctified; made Lord, Christ, Savior, Mediator and Judge by God. Because of that obedience, God lifted him high and honored him far beyond anyone or anything, ever, so that all created beings in heaven and on earth—even those long ago dead and buried—will bow in worship before this Jesus Christ, and call out in praise that he is the Master of all, to the glorious honor of God the Father. (Philippians 2:9-11, The Message)  Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Philippians 2:9-11, New King James Version)  Iglesia ni Cristo belief in God and Jesus Christ: Iglesia ni Cristo believes in the absolute oneness of God, that "the Only True God is the Father" in heaven; The Father is the Lord God Almighty, the Creator of all things. God is Spirit, eternal, immortal and invisible; He is the God and Father of Jesus Christ and His Apostles; and that of Moses, Abraham and the ancient Israelites. Iglesia ni Cristo believes that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God. As the Son of God, Jesus is a Man. However, Jesus is not an ordinary man but a "very special Man", who was sanctified; made Lord, Christ, Savior, Mediator and Judge by God.  Apostle's admonition, warning and unique way of teaching: 1. No prophecy of scripture is a matter of personal interpretation (2 Pt. 1:20, NAB) 2. Do not go beyond what is written. (1 Cor. 4:6, NIV) 3. We do not use words of human wisdom. We speak words given to us by the Spirit, using the Spirit's words to explain spiritual truths. (1 Cor. 2:13, NLT) Points to Consider: 1. Please notice the reason why Jesus was highly exalted, in the preceding verse 8, this is written: "And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross" (NKJV). Thus, Jesus is a man who was obedient to God, even up to death. 2. Notice what the above verse clearly says, "Because of that obedience, God lifted him high and honored him or highly exalted Him.... so all created beings.... will bow and worship Him". Thus, it was God the Father who ordered Jesus to be worshipped, not because Jesus is God but only for God's glorious honor. The fact that God exalted Him and ordered Him to be worshipped is proof that Jesus is not God Himself but a very special Man. 3. For more information:

You were FALSELY tricked by these Deceivers of Faith!

As you can see, the Iglesia ni Cristo cult CAREFULLY CHOSE this particular VERSE in PHILIPPIANS 2 and IGNORED verses 1-8  and highlighted only verse is 9-11

What is that? 

Let's see! BEHOLD the LIARS now being EXPOSED!

Phil. 2:1-11:

If there is any encouragement in Christ, any solace in love, any participation in the Spirit, any compassion and mercy, 2complete my joy by being of the same mind, with the same love, united in heart, thinking one thing.a 3Do nothing out of selfishness or out of vainglory; rather, humbly regard others as more important than yourselves,b 4each looking out not for his own interests, but [also] everyone for those of others.c

5Have among yourselves the same attitude that is also yours in Christ Jesus,*

6Who,* though he was in the form of God,

did not regard equality with God something to be grasped.*

7Rather, he emptied himself,

taking the form of a slave,

coming in human likeness;*

and found human in appearance,e

8he humbled himself,f

becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross.*

9Because of this, God greatly exalted him

and bestowed on him the name*

that is above every name,g

10that at the name of Jesus

every knee should bend,*

of those in heaven and on earth and under the earth,h

11and every tongue confess that

Jesus Christ is Lord,*

to the glory of God the Father.i

As they have HIGHLIGHTED the word "MAN", they COMPLETELY and DELIBERATELY ignored VERSE 6 which also claims Jesus is in the form of GOD! "

... though he (JESUS CHRIST) was in the form of God"

Read the verse again! It says, JESUS was IN THE FORM OF GOD!!!!!

In Verse 7, the Bible says Jesus is GOD coming in HUMAN LIKENESS and we found this GOD in HUMAN appearance!!!!!!

"...coming in human likeness; and found human in appearance."

The Bible says nothing about Jesus being man ONLY as the Iglesia ni Cristo wants his followers to believe!

It says, Jesus is in the FORM of GOD, something we should all GRASP (understand or comprehend).  He is GOD who came in HUMAN LIKENESS and he was FOUND HUMAN IN APPEARANCE.

Now, have you found any wordings there saying JESUS is a MAN ONLY? !!!

If you believed in INC twisted theology, YOU WERE DECEIVED!

Again as you can see:

"... that at the name of Jesus (a MAN only according to INC) every knee should bend, of those in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord..."

Yes!  At the NAME of JESUS, every knee shall bend, every tongue confess...

But this SAME WORDINGS was CLAIMED by GOD the Father in Isaiah 45:23

God the FATHER SAID:

"...To me (GOD) every knee shall bend; by me every tongue shall swear..."

So if we believe in the "Two Lords" theology of the INC of Manalo, we may end up with rivalry between the MAN-Jesus and God the Father!

Going back to Philippians 2, the same chapter says JESUS is in the FORM of GOD, which we SHOULD ALL UNDERSTAND!

I will repeat, we need to "ALL UNDERSTAND" or COMPREHEND or GRASP.

Obviously THEY FAILED to understand, comprehend or grasp that TRUTH.

Yes! The CHURCH teaches that JESUS is a TRUE MAN. Their claim is perfectly in congruence with the teachings of the Catholic Church.

But nowhere in the chapter says "HE IS NOT GOD"!

Yes, HE IS IN THE FORM OF GOD -- yet man in our own appearance!

His DEATH was not due to any reason by the JEWS understood well of his (JESUS) CLAIMS in John 10:33:

The Jews answered him, “We are not stoning you for a good work but for blasphemy. You, a man, are making yourself God.”

Did Christ recant or try to correct these Jewish authorities if his words were completely taken out of context?

No!  He didn't!

Because HE KNEW who he was! How could he ever deny his own identity?

He became obedient, even "death on the cross" says Philippians 2.

So please do not be deceived! Before believing in their carefully chosen verses, you need to READ the WHOLE chapter so you can have a CLEAR picture of what's being talked about, not chop-chop verses to suit their GUILE evil intentions!

And what is the Bible telling us about THESE DECEIVERS of Faith?

Here is from 2 John 1:7

Many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh; such is the deceitful one and the antichrist.

Yes, the IGLESIA NI CRISTO of MANALO is the fulfillment of this message.  They denied JESUS who is GOD coming in the FLESH...

Exposing these DECEIT and LIES of INC of Manalo, may bring souls to the realization that the Iglesia ni Cristo is the anti-Christ disguising as a "church".

To Jesus Christ be praised FOREVER and EVER!