"The Christianity of history is not Protestantism. If ever there were a safe truth it is this, and Protestantism has ever felt it so; to be deep in history is to cease to be a Protestant." (-John Henry Newman, An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine).

"Where the bishop is, there let the people gather; just as where ever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church". -St. Ignatius of Antioch (ca 110 AD)a martyr later thrown to the lions, wrote to a church in Asia Minor. Antioch was also where the term "Christian" was first used.

“But if I should be delayed, you should know how to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth.” 1 Timothy 3:15

"This is the sole Church of Christ, which in the Creed we profess to be one, holy, catholic and apostolic." -CCC 811

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Iglesia Katolika: Ang nag-iisang Iglesia ni Cristo

Basahin ang nag-iisang IGLESIA NI CRISTO!!!

Ang sabi ni README kaanib ng Iglesia ni Manalo:
"One of the many attacks is this, they say, what was written in the bible is not (capital letter)"Iglesia ni Cristo" but only (small letter) "iglesia ni Cristo". So, when quoting Romans 16:16 in filipino bible, it is said, "mga iglesia ni Cristo" or in english bible "churches of Christ" not in capital letters, but the Pasugo Magazine change it with a capital letter always...

"First of all, the INC doesnt care if it is written as Iglesia ni Cristo or iglesia ni Cristo or iglesia ni cristo or IGLESIA NI CRISTO because these are all the same! What the INC teaches is that the church that was established by Christ is none other than the Iglesia ni Cristo."
Quote mula sa post:
Malaking kagalakan ang mababasa natin sa mga comments na mababasa sa post ni README kaanib ng Iglesia ni Manalo sa pagsabing MALI raw at KONTRA ang aking post sa "iglesia o Iglesia".

Ayon sa may-ari ng blog na READMEInc, ang tunay daw na Iglesia ay ang "Iglesia ni Cristo". 

Maka-100% agree po tayo diyan.  Wala pong duda na ang tunay na Iglesia ay ang nag-iisang IGLESIA NI CRISTO pero ito ay hindi ang KATUNOG na itinatag ni Felix Manalo sa Punta Santa Ana Maynila.

Ang tinutukoy na NAG-IISANG IGLESIA ay ang IGLESIANG TATAG NI CRISTO sa JERUSALEM!

Ang iglesiang founded sa Sta. Ana na sa TAGALOG lamang nasusulat ay PEKE.  Samantalang ang itinatag ni Cristo sa Jerusalem ay hindi napapasailalim sa isang wika lamang at hindi rehistrado sa ilalim ng pamunuan ng kahit anong gobyerno ng tao.

At upang malaman natin kung alin nga ba ang TUNAY  IGLESIA na binabanggit sa Roma 16:16, ating hanguhin ngayon ang kanilang OFFICIAL magazine upang magpatotoo rito.

PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 7:
“Ang tunay na INK ay iisa lamang. Ito ang Iglesiyang itinayo ni Cristo. Kung mayroon mang nagsisibangon ngayong mga Iglesia at sasabihing sila man ay Iglesia ni Cristo rin, ang mga ito ay hindi tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo kundi huwad lamang."

PASUGO Mayo 1954, p. 9:
“Alin ang tunay na Iglesia? Ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo sa Jerusalem."
At HINDI ang itinayo ni Manalo sa Pilipinas!

Kung tuus-tuusin ay wala na tayong dapat pang linawin pa dahil inilahad na pong sinabi OFFICIALLY ng INC ni Manalo na ang kanilang Iglesia ay HUWAD o PEKE sapagkat kailan laman sila "nagsisibangon ngayon."

 Sa mga salin na Biblia na kanilang pinagkukunan ng quote sa Roma 16:16, wala ni isa sa kanila ang nakalagay na "Iglesia" (Church) kundi "iglesia" (churches).  Iba naman kapag ito'y sinipi nila at ipalathala sa magasing Pasugo.


Ang maliit na titik ay ginagawa nilang malaking titik upang lalabas na ito ay PROPER NOUN.

Sa kanilang pagko-collect ng mga salin ng Biblia, tanging sa CATHOLIC EDITION (Tagalog) lamang nila masusumpungan ang mga katagang "mga Iglesia ni Cristo" (malaking titik) at sa buong akala nila ay SILA ang tinutukoy ng Santa Iglesia roon.


Hindi nila alintana na ang kanilang pinagsasaya ay hugot mula sa CATHOLIC EDITION ng Biblia na lalong nagpapatingkad sa mga nakasaad sa OFFICIAL MAGAZINE na PASUGO.

PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 7:

    “Ang tunay na INK ay iisa lamang. Ito ang Iglesiyang itinayo ni Cristo. Kung mayroon mang nagsisibangon ngayong mga Iglesia at sasabihing sila man ay Iglesia ni Cristo rin, ang mga ito ay hindi tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo kundi huwad lamang."

PASUGO Mayo 1954, p. 9:

    “Alin ang tunay na Iglesia? Ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo sa Jerusalem."


Ayon ulit kay G. ReadmeInc,

Another thing, the phrase "churches of Christ" is not the name of the church that was established by Christ, it only denotes that Christ's church has congregations in other parts of the world. Because in the time the church was preached by the apostles, there are congregations or churches in other countries. For example, there is also a church in U.S.A, Europe, China, Philippines and Indonesia that's why it is said to be "churches of Christ", but the church that was established by Christ is not many, but only ONE that's why it should also be singular, "Church of Christ" or "Iglesia ni Cristo".

Ang iglesia raw ay IISA sapagkat IISA lamang daw ang itinatag ni Cristo kaya't marapat lamang daw na "Iglesia" ito at hindi "iglesia".  

Iyan din ang ITINUTURO ng Santa Iglesia mula pa noong ito'y ITINATAG sa JERUSALEM.  Na may IISANG IGLESIA at lahat ng mga nagpapanggap na "Iglesia" rin ay pawang mga PEKE o HUWAD lamang ayon sa magasing Pasugo.

Sa mga pangungusap ng kaanib ng INC ni Manalo na si Readme, at ng kanilang PASUGO, at ang CATHOLIC EDITION ng Roma 16:16 lalabas na ang NAG-IISANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO noon pang panahon ni Apostol San Pablo (na siyang sumulat ng Sulat sa mga taga-Roma) ay ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA lamang sapagkat tanging ito lamang sa maraming nag-aangking mga "iglesia" rin ang may kasaysayang nagmula pa noong UNANG SIGLO.

Sa katunayan ay tumatawid na po ito sa IKATLONG SIGLO samantalang ang "Iglesia ni Cristo" na KOPYA lamang ni Manalo ay papunta pa lamang sa SENTENARYO ngayong 2014 Anno Domini.

Tunay nga na TANGING ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA lamang ang nag-iisang IGLESIA NI CRISTO sapagkat ito rin ang paglalahad ng OFFICIAL MAGAZINE ng INC ni Manalo:

PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46:
“Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo."

At bago pa man nila muling sasabihin na NATALIKOD na GANAP ang tunay na Iglesiang tatag ni Cristo, abah, magsuri sila sapagkat hindi ito ang ITINUTURO ng INC ni Manalo.

Ayon sa magasing PASUGO hango mula sa aklat na pinamagatang "ANG KATOTOHANAN TUNGKOL SA INK-1914"  ang IGLESIA ay HINDI NATALIKOD.  Ito'y UMIIRAL pa hanggang sa KASALUKUYANkaya't lalong tumitibay ang unang sinabi ng PASUGO na HUWAG o PEKE lamang ang mga "nagsisibangon ngayon" na may kapangalang "Iglesia ni Cristo."

PASUGO Enero 1964, p. 2:
“Sa isang paksang mababasa sa nakaraang labas nitong Pasugo (Disyembre) ay ipinaliwanag kung saan naroon ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo noong unang siglo as Jerusalem. Ito ay natalikod. Nalipol na lahat."

Itong mga sinasabi nilang ito ay maraming nailigaw na landas ng Kabanalan. Dahil dito ay inilalahad ko ang mga katibayang magpapawalang saysaysa sinasabi nilang ito at nasusulat din sa kanilang Pasugo gaya nitong mga sumusunod:

(a). PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 5:
"Ano ang katangian ng maging Tupa ni Cristo? Sa Juan 10:28 ay ganito ang sabi: 'At sila'y binigyan ko ng walang hanggang buhay, at kailanma'y hindi sila malilipol, at hindi aagawin ng sinuman sa aking kamay'. Isang dakilang kapalaran ang maging Tupa o Tauhan ni Cristo sapagkat sila'y binibigyan niya ng walang hanggang buhay at hindi sila malilipol kailan man."

Idaragdag natin dito ang talata 29, bilang susog sa talatang 28 na ginagamit nila, at ganito ang karugtong:

(29) Ang aking Ama (wika niJesus), na sa kanila ay nagbigay sa akin ay lalong dakila kaysa lahat; at hindi sila maaagaw ninuman sa kamay ng Ama." Ito bang nasusulat na ito sa kanilang PASUGO ay mabubura pa nila? Gayon din itong garantiyang sinasabi ni Jesus hinggil [sa] mga magiging tauhan niya? At higit pa bang paniniwalaan natin itong mga maling aral!

At bilang kalakip nito ay sisikapin pa natin ang isang banggit na nasusulat sa PASUGO Hunyo 1940, p. 27:

"Papaano ang pag-aalaga at pag-iingat sa pananampalataya? Wala tayong dapat gawin kundi manatili sa mga aral ng Dios na ating napag-aralan. Ito ang ginawa ng unang Iglesia. Sila'y nanatiling matibay sa aral ng mga Apostol. Ganito rin ang dapat nating gawin."

O ano pa ang ating puntong liliwanagin? Tinatanggap na nilang nananatiling matibay sa aral ng Dios ang mga Apostol ang unang Iglesia ni Cristo. At pagkatapos ay iyan daw ang kanilang pamarisan o dapat gawin. E, gayon pala; bakit sinasabi nilang "ganap na nawala sa ibabaw ng lupa ang mga dating tagasunod ni Jesus, inagaw at nilipol ng mga bulaang propeta." Huwag ninyong gawing sinungaling si Jesus. Malinaw ang kanyang sinabing garantiya na mababasa sa Juan 10:28-29, at inyong ginamit din.

At bago tayo magwakas ay kukuha pa tayo ng isang punto na may kaugnayan din dito.

(b). PASUGO Agosto 1971, p.22:
“Tinitindigan namin na ang Iglesiang itinatag ni Cristo ay talagang iisa
lamang. Nang magkaroon ng INK sa Pilipinas ay wala na ang Iglesia ni Cristo sa Jerusalem.”

Ang ibig nilang palitawin dito, ay noong 1914, ay nawala na ang itinayo ni Cristo. Bueno, tingnan natin ang bagay na ito, sapagkat may isang banggit na nasusulat sa PASUGO, Abril 1966, p. 46:

“Ang totoo hanggang sa kasalukuyan ay patuloy na ginagawa ni Satanas ang pagpapasok ng mga maling aral sa Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula'y siyang Iglesia ni Cristo. Sadyang matalino at tuso ang diablo. Hindi niya ginawang biglaan ang pagtalikod sa Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo noong unang siglo."


Ngayon, ang mga nakasulat ba sa CATHOLIC EDITION ng Bible ay LABAN sa Iglesia Katolika?  Hindi po.  Sinasabi lamang namin na KAMI ang binabanggit doon sa Roma 16:16 at hindi ang INC ni Manalo sa Pinas.  


Ang nag-iisang IGLESIA NI CRISTO na tatag ni Cristo sa Jerusalem? 

Friday, December 14, 2012

Kung bakit natalo si Manny Pacquiao (?)

Mula sa post ni Berto sa blog na Pilipinong Katoliko

Kung born again pa rin ako hanggang ngayon, matutuwa ako kay Manny Pacquiao.

Kasi iniwan na niya ang pagiging Katoliko.

Nakalaya na siya sa kabulaanan ng Roma.

Iniwan na niya ang biskwit na Hesus.

Hindi na siya nagsisimba sa simbahan ni “Boy Negro” sa Quiapo.

Hindi na rin siya nagsu-suot ng prayer beads ng mga pagano.

At higit sa lahat nakilala na niya si LORD (sa point of view ng mga born again).

PERO kung born again pa rin ako ngayon magtataka rin ako…

…kasi sabi sa Biblia.

“Walang sinumang sumasampalataya sa kanya ang mapapahiya.” (Roma 10:11)

“No one whose hope is in you will ever be put to shame” (Psalm 25:3 NIV)

Kelan ba niya nakilala si LORD (sa point of view ng mga born again)?

Sa pagkakatanda ko e bago yung laban niya kay Timothy Bradley eh si Lord na ang lagi niyang bukambibig. Lagi niyang sinasabi na “sabi sa akin ni Lord…” dahil napasama siya sa mga born again.

KAYA LANG…

Bakit naman kung kelan niya nakilala si Lord e saka naman siya natalo sa huling dalawang laban niya?

Yung unang pagkatalo niya pwede pa nating isipin na nagkamali lang ang mga hurado sa pagdedesisyon.

Pero itong laban niya kanina, malinaw na malinaw na natalo siya.

At ang nakakalungkot at masklap e para siyang humalik sa lupa nung huling bagsak niya.

Bakit? Bakit kung kelan niya nakilala si LORD (sa point of view ng mga born again) e saka siya natalo sa mga laban? sa nakakahiyang paraan ng pagkatalo?

Ibig sabihin ba yung buong panahon na lumaban siya na siya ay Katoliko, hindi niya kasama si Lord e madalas panalo siya. Matalo man siya hindi siya napapatumba.

Ngayong nakilala niya si Lord…walang sign of the cross, walang rosary….HILAHOD?!?!

Ganun ba yun? Di ba…

“Walang sinumang sumasampalataya sa kanya ang mapapahiya.” (Roma 10:11)

“No one whose hope is in you will ever be put to shame” (Psalm 25:3 NIV)

Saturday, November 24, 2012

The Catholic Church provides the fullest of graces... - Mayor Socrates Fernandez

"Once a minister of an iglesia approached me and said: 'I will give you this house and lot if you will change your religion to ours.' I said immediately to him: 'Yes!'

The minister was so happy to hear it and said: 'Really, you would?'. I answered back: 'Yes, I will convert to your faith if the time comes that I will be insane.' He proposed with a condition, I answered in return with a condition.

"I will not change my religion because it is worthwhile to be a Catholic. We are provided with the fullest of graces and friendship comes easily along the way."

HON. MAYOR SOCRATES FERNANDEZ
Present Mayor of Talisay City, Cebu.
Former Seventh Day Adventist, renowned Catholic Apologist, Debater/Catholic Faith Defender.
Source: 100% Katolikong Pinoy Group in Facebook

The "little" woman who united the UN assembly in prayer


Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Vatican News: Christians in high Mesopotamia refuse to take up arms. Bishops' appeal to the Pope and the leaders of Nations: avoid the catastrophe that is upon us

Gregory III Laham (Source: CathNews)
Kamishly (Agenzia Fides/News.va) - An urgent appeal to the Pope, the UN Secretary General and the Heads of State so that catastrophe that threatens Syrian populations of high Mesopotamia, between the Tigris and the Euphrates is avoided. This appeal is launched, through Fides, by three Bishops of the region at the end of three days of fasting in which Christians in the area have asked the Lord for the gift of peace.

Archbishop Jacques Behnan Hindo, owner of the Syrian Catholic archeparchy of Hassaké-Nisibis, from the parish of Saints Peter and Paul in Kamishly describe to Fides Agency a situation on the brink of precepice: "In past days, the Salafis entered Ras al Ain. From there 30 thousand people fled, which were added to the already 400 thousand refugees from Deir el Zor, Homs and Aleppo. Now they and those of the Free Syrian Army, on the Turkish border, may head towards the province of Jazira, urban centers of Hassaké and Kamishly.

If they do, the army of Assad will start bombing, just as what happened in Ras al Ain. It will be a slaughter, and there will be another 800 thousand people forced to flee, not knowing where." The Archbishop, in coordination with the other Bishops - the Syrian Orthodox and Assyrian - and with local leaders of other ethnic and religious communities, is engaged in feverish efforts of mediation to prevent new tragedies to his people.

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Celebrating the Birthday of the Manalos: Iglesia ni Cristo's Hypocrisy

Iglesia ni Cristo will celebrate with joy the birth of EDUARDO V. MANALO, now the Executive Minister, grandson of INC's founder Felix Manalo, on October 31.

On the contrary, they are oppose on celebrating Christmas (December 25) the commemoration Birthday of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Friday, November 16, 2012

The Catholic Church is complete!

Many Protestant sects including the pseudo-Chritian sect founded by Felix Manalo in the Philippines (The Iglesia ni Cristo®) would be surprised by the fact that the Catholic Church is the only Church that is COMPLETE. Out of the many claimants, only the Catholic Church has complete history, complete teachings, councils, doctrines, dogmas, lineage, patrimony etc.

Such that we were founded by Jesus in 33AD; we have 266 Popes, we have 21 ecumenical councils, we have 73 Books of the Bible and we have complete doctrines!

In reverence, Pope Benedict Lifting up the Gospel books.
Speaking of the Books of the Bible, Protestant churches and the Iglesia ni Cristo® of Manalo are helpless when we talk on HOW THE BIBLE CAME TO US. To this day, still many of their followers lived in total ignorance accusing the Catholic Church of having "ADDED" 7 more books.

In TRUTH it was Martin Luther who REMOVED the 7 books (highlighted in red) which had been approved 1500 years before the birth of Protestantism by the same CHURCH OF CHRIST in 382 AD through Pope Damasus I, reaffirmed in the Councils at Hippo (393 AD) and Carthage (397 AD); reaffirmed by Pope Innocent I in 405 AD; re-affirmed at the Council of CArthage in 419 AD; re-affirmed at the Council of Trent in 1546 in response to Martin Luther's removing of the 7 books (source: Catholic 101).

Of course Protestant pastors and ministers including those paid ministers of Manalo's INC Church do not tell these facts to their followers with all honesty. They lie so as to keep their members deceived and remained anti-Catholics.

So how many books are there in the original Bible before the Protestant Reformation?
Here is the surprise!  (Source: Wiki-Answers)

There are seventy-three books in the Canon of the Catholic Bible; forty-six in the Old Testament and twenty-seven in the New Testament. The canon of Scripture refers to the final collection of inspired books included in the Bible. The Catholic Bible contains seven books that do not appear in the Protestant Old Testament. These seven writings are called the deuterocanonicals or the Second Law. Protestants usually call these writings the Apocrypha (meaning hidden), books they consider outside the canon. These seven writings include 1 and 2 Maccabees, Tobit, Judith, Sirach, Wisdom, and Baruch, along with additional passages in Daniel and Esther. Before the time of Christ, these writings were included in the Jewish Greek Septuagint (LXX)-the Greek translation of Jewish Scripture-but they were not included in the Hebrew Masoretic text.

Until the Protestant Reformation the Catholic Bible was the only edition since, obviously, there were no "denominations" that wanted to revise the Bible.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Muslim converts to Christ, frowned upon by the Ummah and Christian communities

by Mohammed Christophe Bilek
Mohammed Christophe Bilek pleads with Muslims to defend freedom of conscience and the right of Muslims to change their religion in the same way that Christians can embrace the Muslim religion. At the same time, he calls on Christians not to marginalise converts and work instead to ensure their rights in Muslim countries and in Europe.

Paris (AsiaNews) - Many Muslim converts to Christianity face direct persecution by Muslims and indifference from fellow Christians, not only in their countries of origin, but also in Europe, where freedom of conscience is not protected, only the freedom of Muslims to bear witness to their faith is. Mohammed Christophe Bilek makes his plea in a letter to AsiaNews.

Mohammed Christophe Bilek was born in Algeria in 1950 and has lived in France since 1961. He is the author of Un Algérien pas très catholique (A not very Catholic Algerian), published by Cerf (1999) and Saint Augustin raconté à ma fille (Saint Augustine as told to my daughter), published by Éditions Qabel (2011).

In the 1990s, he founded Notre Dame de Kabylie (in French), a website devoted to Muslim-Christian dialogue and to evangelisation among Muslims.

Dear friends, if persecution is the destiny of many Christians, what about Muslims who want to become Christians? They are like children asking to be born who are denied the right to exist!

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Iglesia ni Cristo Logo: Religious or Business Trademark?

The  INC is a Corporation disguising as a "religion". This news appeared in many Business related news!



12 Filipino Firms Seek International Trademark Protection Via Madrid

Philippines — The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) received 12 international applications on Tuesday, July 25, marking the first day of entry into force of the Madrid Protocol in the Philippines bringing a total of of 82 international registrations by Filipino trademark owners.

The Madrid Protocol designated a total of 82 Contracting Parties and consequently extending trademark protection of the involved brands to 160 countries worldwide.

Ten of the applicants originate from the buzzing City of Cebu, namely: Profood International Corporation (Philippine Brand Dried Mangoes and Profood Cebu Dried Mangoes), International Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Efficascent Oil, Omega Painkiller Liniment, Gastripac, Bioderm, and Dr. S. Wong’s Sulfur Soap), Magicmelt Foods, Inc. (Magic Melt), Arden Siarot (Arden), and Murillo’s Export International, Inc. (Murillo).

The two applicants from Manila are international fashion designer Robert Tomas (Tomas) and religious group Iglesia Ni Cristo (Iglesia Ni Cristo seal).

Pope says leave the Church if you don't believe!

VATICAN CITY, August 28, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In his Angelus address Sunday, Pope Benedict XVI spoke of Judas’ betrayal of Christ, saying that Judas’ problem was failing to leave Christ when he no longer believed – a “falsehood,” said the Pope, “which is a mark of the devil.”

“Judas,” said Pope Benedict, “could have left, as many of the disciples did; indeed, he would have left if he were honest. Instead he remained with Jesus. He did not remain because of faith, or because of love, but with the secret intention of taking vengeance on the Master.” Read more here...

Saturday, November 10, 2012

The Immaculate Conception: What About the Eastern Orthodox Churches?


One objection raised by some Protestants is this: If the Immaculate Conception is truly apostolic teaching, then why do the Eastern Orthodox Churches reject it? After all, those Churches trace their lineage to apostolic times just as the Catholic Church does. To answer that, we have to understand why the Roman Church developed her doctrine in the way she did and why the East did not take the same path.

Some people have the notion the Eastern Orthodox Churches reject the Immaculate Conception because a few early Eastern Fathers (Origen, Basil, and John Chrysostom) expressed a couple of doubts about Mary’s sinlessness. Origen thought that, during Christ’s Passion, the sword that pierced Mary’s soul was disbelief. Basil had the same notion. And John Chrysostom thought her guilty of ambition and pushiness in Matthew 12:46 (an incident we have already examined).

But the remarkable thing about these opinions is how isolated they turn out to be. Essentially, they demonstrate (once again) something about the development of doctrine that we’ve already seen in connection with the Trinity: The Catholic Church is not a monolith and her people, even very good people, sometimes voice in good faith ideas that end up departing from the orthodox norm. For the reality is that, apart from these three, the overwhelming consensus of the Fathers in both east and west is that Mary is “most pure,” (Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom) “formed without any stain,” (Proclus, Laudatio in S. Dei Gen. ort., I, 3) “all-Holy,”( Hippolytus, Against Beron and Helix, Frag VIII) “undefiled,” (Ibid) “spotless,”( Hippolytus, A Discourse on the End of the World) “immaculate of the immaculate,”( Origen, Homily 1) “inviolate and free from every stain of sin,”( Ambrose, Commentary on Psalm 118, 22–30) and created in a condition more sublime and glorious than all other natures.( Theodorus of Jerusalem in Mansi, XII, 1140) In short, for the Eastern Fathers, as for the Catholic Church, Mary is as St. Ephraim describes her:

Most holy Lady, Mother of God, alone most pure in soul and body, alone exceeding all perfection of purity . . . alone made in thy entirety the home of all the graces of the Most Holy Spirit, and hence exceeding beyond all compare even the angelic virtues in purity and sanctity of soul and body . . . my Lady most holy, all-pure, all-immaculate, all-stainless, all-undefiled, all-incorrupt, all inviolate spotless robe of Him Who clothes Himself with light as with a garment . . . flower unfading, purple woven by God, alone most immaculate( Ephraim the Syrian, Precationes ad Deiparam in Opp. Graec. Lat., III, 524– 37).

So if the Eastern Orthodox Churches ignored Origen, Basil, and Chrysostom when they speculated that Mary was sinful, why do they reject the Immaculate Conception? In a nutshell, they reject it because the Immaculate Conception is the answer to a number of questions the Eastern Christians were never much interested in asking. And if you don’t ask the questions, you don’t come up with the answers. But, as we shall see, that’s cold comfort for Evangelicals. Read more here...

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Millions attended the Iglesia Ni Cristo Grand Bible Exposition in the Philippines

The media said, "Millions attended the Iglesia Ni Cristo Grand Bible Exposition in the Philippines" (Source: iReport/CNN)

But whose Bible did they use for their "Grand Bible Exposition"? Remember, the Iglesia of Manalo do not have a Bible version of their own.

In their desire to appear "Biblical" in their teachings, they couldn't help but relied on CATHOLIC (and other PROTESTANT) versions of the Bible! (History can prove the Bible is Catholic).

In their official magazine called PASUGO, the INC of Manalo stressed that the Catholic Church is not for Christ for for the devil.

PASUGO Agosto 1962, p. 9:
“Kaya ang tunay na anti-Cristo, ang mga Papa ng Iglesia Katolika Apostolika Romana. At ang tunay na ampon ng anti-Cristo ay ang mga Katoliko.”

PASUGO Oktubre 1956, p. 1:
“Ang Iglesia ni Cristo ay nagdaos ng pamamahayag sa Lunsod ng Davao. Nagsalita roon si Kapatid na Felix Manalo at ang kasama niyang mga Ministro. Ipinahayag doon ng mga nagsalita na ang Iglesia Katolika Romana ay hindi itinatag ni Cristo kundi itinatag ng Diablo."


PASUGO Disyembre 1965, p. 5:
“Kaninong Ministro kung ganyan ang mga Paring Katoliko? Mga Ministro ni Satanas na Diablo."

And yet admitted in the same official magazine that the Catholic Church was the original Church of Christ.

PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46:
“Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo."

And to EXPOSE their HYPOCRISY, the CHURCH which they accused of being of the devil and founded by Satan was RESPONSIBLE in giving the ENTIRE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY with the SACRED SCRIPTURES.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Is USA and Western media becoming more afraid of Islam?

"I see this in other news outlets and on TV, too. Sober-looking newsmen and newswomen mention Mohammed as The Prophet Mohammed. No ifs, ands or buts. I hear it on the BBC World Service, too.

"Now, if Muslims want to believe that Mohammed is The Prophet, God bless them. Fine and dandy. If anyone wants to believe that, good luck to him or her. But why does our mainstream media here in the USA, an overwhelmingly Christian country, refer to Islam's prophet as "The Prophet"?

"Have you ever seen any major newspaper here in the USA refer to Jesus Christ as "The Son of God, God Incarnate, The Lord Jesus Christ"? Can you imagine the New York Times running a story about a crucifix resting in urine at an "art gallery" as an offense against "The Lord Jesus, Son of God"? Can you imagine any large newspaper in this country running a story about the Pope and referring to him as "The Holy Father, The Bridge Between Heaven and Earth"? Or about Mary, as "Holy Mary, Mother of God"? It would never happen." Read more at Facing Islam...

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Philippines has world's second youngest cardinal: It's Luis Cardinal Tagle

Cardinals in Red (Source: Whispers in Loggia)
VATICAN CITY (Source: Sunstar) -- Pope Benedict XVI has named six new cardinals, adding prelates from Lebanon, the Philippines, Nigeria, Colombia, India and the United States to the ranks of cardinals who will elect his successor.

Benedict made the surprise announcement during his weekly general audience Wednesday and said they would be elevated at a consistory November 24. The nominations help even out the geographic distribution of cardinals, which had tilted heavily toward Italy.

The new cardinals are: Archbishop of Manila, Philippines, Luis Antonio Tagle; Monsignor James Harvey, the American prefect of the pope's household; Archbishop of Abuja, Nigeria, John Olorunfemi Onaiyekan; Archbishop of Bogota, Colombia, Ruben Salazar Gomez; Patriarch of Antioch of the Maronites in Lebanon, Bechara Boutros Rai; and the major Archbishop of the Trivandrum of the Siro-Malankaresi in India, Baselios Cleemis Thottunkal. (AP)

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Are Catholics Christian?


I have an Evangelical friend who asked me:

"what is the difference between Catholics and Christians?"

I had to scratch my head for a few moments because it never occurred to me that some people didn't think Catholics are Christian. I think it is good that Evangelicals and Catholics have lively discussions on the interpretation of Scripture. Evangelicals do that with each other all the time. That's why there are so many different denominations. However, I have a big problem with any organization that says "Catholics are not Christians," because they are ignoring the history of Christianity. The name Christian predates all Protestant and Evangelical Churches by over a millennium. Many Evangelicals who think that Catholics are not Christian may be surprised to learn they accept the authority of several Catholic councils every time they pick up their Bible. The Bible didn't fall out of the sky, spiral bound with an NIV sticker on it. It has a rich Catholic history.

Any time spent studying the Church Fathers will make it abundantly clear that early Christian beliefs were Catholic. Their complete unity over the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist is only one example... Continue reading...

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

The Catholic Church has the Answers!!!

From CATHOLIC APOLOGETICS

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH is the world's largest, and Christianity's oldest, religious body. Her 1 billion members inhabit the width and breadth of the earth, comprising almost one-fifth of the total human population. She is far and away the most popular religious concept the world has ever known. Paradoxically, however, the Catholic Church is also the world's most controversial religious concept. Catholic belief is different, too different to be orthodox, say Protestants and Christian cultists. Catholic belief is too ethereal to be logical, and too strict to be enjoyable, say the humanists and agnostics. Hence to millions of people, Catholicism is not only a colossal success, it is also a colossal enigma. Of course, there has to be an explanation for these contradictory opinions -- and there is an explanation: Protestants and others who have questions about Catholic belief too often make the mistake of going to the wrong place for the answers. Too often books written by religious incompetents are consulted. The result is incomplete and distorted information. With such information, one cannot help but see the Catholic faith as a colossal enigma.

The right place to go for information about Catholic belief -- in fact the only place to go for complete and authoritative information -- is the Catholic Church herself. As any detective will tell you, no investigation is quite so complete as an on-the-spot investigation. Hence, dear reader, if you are a Protestant, an unaffiliated Christian, or an agnostic, who wants to know the truth about Catholic belief, take this friendly advice: Seek out a Catholic priest and put your questions to him. You will find him a very understanding and obliging person. Or read this little booklet. This booklet was written by a Catholic who knows the questions you are likely to ask, as well as the answers, because once he, too, was outside of the Catholic Church, looking in. The questions in this booklet are basically the same ones he put to a Catholic priest, and the answers are basically the same ones given him by that priest. Read this booklet; then forget all the fiction you have heard about the Catholic Church, for you will have the gospel truth.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Patriarch of Jerusalem: New Evangelisation must be open to others (Vatican News)

Patriarch of Jerusalem Church Faoud Twal
News.va - The Thirteenth General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops continues Saturday, with interventions from Bishops from around the world.

Covering the Synod for Vatican Radio, Philippa Hitchen spoke with Patriarch Faoud Twal about his message for the assembled Bishops. He said that, in a certain way, the New Evangelisation must return to its roots in the Church of Jerusalem: “I mention in my intervention that the whole thing started in Jerusalem, from Jerusalem, and really to be a good and genuine and efficient new evangelisation we must go back to the first community. Any big event in the Church must go back to Jerusalem, start with Jerusalem, and really start again with Jerusalem to be a genuine and a good one.”

Patriarch Twal says that he would encourage his fellow Bishops to visit the Holy Land with their seminarians, their priests and their communities. “Come to see what we call the living stones, and encourage us, share with us our fears, our joys, our aspiration. Share with us the prayer, we need the prayer, to come back to prayer.”

He said that, despite the difficulties for Christians in the Middle East, it was important for the community to move beyond its own boundaries. “Any good faith and evangelism must be open to others with more bridges and less walls.”

(LIE) Iglesia ni Cristo: More and more people embracing the true Church of Christ



Where is the official statistics showing that there are "more and more" people embracing the "true" faked church? ^_^

Saturday, October 13, 2012

World's Biggest Dome is not anymore the Iglesia ni Cristo Arena

With its short-lived jubilation, the Iglesia ni Cristo's "Philippine Arena" is NOT anymore the biggest dome in the world.

Singapore's National sports stadium ("Singapore Sports Hub") is now officially the biggest dome in the world when completed in 2014 which coincides with the completion date of the Iglesia's Philippine Arena.  

While Singapore's National Stadium will be used for national and international sports events and other international world cups, the INC's Philippine Arena will be used for its Centennial Founding Anniversary.  The Iglesia ni Cristo church was founded by Felix Manalo in July 27, 1914.

Photo Source: Singapore Yahoo! News

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Multi-Million Dollar Church buying properties but withouth official teachings in the Internet

News Source: CoStar News:

Miracle Temple Church of God in Christ Sells Industrial Building for $4.3M
Iglesia Ni Cristo Purchases New Seattle HQ


Iglesia Ni Cristo purchased the industrial property located at 7100 42nd St. S in Seattle, WA for $4.3 million, or about $176 per square foot. The building was used by Miracle Temple Church of God in Christ for religious and community events for more than ten years.

The 24,472-square-foot property was constructed in 1968. The site was reported to have oil contamination issues, which lead to a lengthy negotiation process, but it turns out the issue had been resolved by the previous owner and was not reflected on record.

Iglesia Ni Cristo plans to renovate the space; they are currently waiting on the permits from the county. The space will serve as its new headquarters location for the Washington region.

Roosevelt Hubbard of Prudential RNT Real Estate represented the seller. Tialyne Landon of Realty Plus, Inc. represented the buyer.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

INC Newport purchased a Baptist church

"...no pictures of Jesus Christ – the Church does not worship idols."


Newport church re-opens for worship after £1.6m revamp
Source: South Wales Argus

A 100-YEAR-OLD former church in Newport that served as a performing arts academy has been returned to its use as a place of worship after a £1.6 million project.

The Philippines-based Iglesia Ni Cristo, which translates to Church of Christ, has renovated the Grade I-listed Burleigh Hall in Llanthewy Road, Newport, to be a base for its congregation stretching from West Wales to the West Country.

INC of Manalo purchased formerly Protestant church

Source: Azstarnet Business

• Iglesia Ni Cristo purchased a 7,000-square-foot church building, formerly Park Avenue Christian Church, at 4635 S. Park Ave., from Arizona Christian Missionary Society. Rob Tomlinson of PICOR Commercial Real Estate Services handled the $380,000 transaction.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

The IGLESIA NI CRISTO beliefs

Below is an unofficial summary of the belief of the Iglesia ni Cristo - church founded by Felix Manalo in the Philippines, registered in July 27, 1914.  Their official teachings are carefully kept in secrecy at their Central Office in Manila, we can only base our understanding of their argument operating on these beliefs. [Source:The Iglesia ni Cristo: God's Message BLOG]

Note: Felix Manalo was never baptized in the Iglesia which for them makes him equal with John the Baptist.  Notice the "Father, Son and Holy Spirit" but not the Trinity; their teachings on "Christian Unity" is not on Ecumenism but unity within themselves as members of the Iglesia ni Cristo.  They remain deeply unbending, rigid, anti-Catholic in all their teachings. They do not have official representative on Christian Ecumenism. They detest every church that teaches Christ as God and hated the Doctrine of the Trinity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

About

What’s the difference?

Is the usual remark we hear from some people when the Iglesia Ni Cristo is introduced to them. It is a perfectly sound and legitimate question to ask considering that there are so many religions today vying against each other, and making claims and counterclaims that theirs is the best church to affiliate one’s self with.

Many people had joined one religion after another without having noticed any substantial difference among those religions. Some of them even felt they had been tricked; others downright deceived. From such sad experiences some of them make a sweeping conclusion that all religions are the same. And depending on the degree of their disillusionment they become indifferent to religion, or overly cautious or altogether shy away from any religion. Some of them even become anti- religion. But that should not be the case.

While there are so many false religions in the world today, this fact alone does not warrant the conclusion that all religions are false. There is a true religion, one which worships and serves the true God based on His true words written in the Bible. Everyone owes it to God and to himself to find this true religion. And one may start searching by asking how one religion differs from the other.

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Sagot sa kaanib ng INC ni Manalo

Narito ang isa sa mga dahilan kung bakit kailangan ng bawat Katoliko na ipagtanggol ang kanyang mga aral:

Mga komento mula sa post kong Alin ang Iglesiang binabati ng "lahat ng mga iglesia ni Cristo: Iglesia sa Roma o Iglesia sa Pilipinas?

Replies

  1. karen April 8, 2012 3:18 PM
    catholic po b ang itinatayo ni cristo? bakit po every year namamatay si cristo sa loob po ng katoliko what i mean semana santa, diba po matagal ng patay si cristo? bakit po ang binago sa pamamaraan ng katoliko gaya po ng pag bibinyag, d pag aasawa ng pari at pag samba sa diyos diyosan marami pa pong iba.. kung catholico po ang tunay relehiyon bakit po binago ang mga utos ng diyos na nka sulat sa bible? paki sagot lang po...

  2. Catholic Defender April 8, 2012 9:50 PM
    Hahaha.. kapag ipinagdiriwan niyo pala ang kaarawan ni EDUARDO ibig sabihin paulit ulit na ipinapanganak si Eduardo...

    Hahahahaahhahaha!!!

  3. karen April 9, 2012 8:22 AM
    sagotin nyo po muna ang tanong ko po.. yan ba sagot mo ang tumawa.. bakit po every year namamatay si cristo sa loob po ng katoliko what i mean semana santa, diba po matagal ng patay si cristo? hndi ganun mali po kayo hindi po paulit ulit ipinangak c bro. edwardo ang pa ulit ulit po ay ang kapanganakan nya po yung date at year ng pag silang nya hindi po sya.. ikaw man pag nag birth day ka pa ulit ulit habang buhay ka pa d ho ba..

  4. rodylin August 14, 2012 5:53 AM
    tama karen isa akong INC member, at i realy agreed with you defense.
    Delete
  5. Catholic Defender August 14, 2012 7:56 PM
    I have proven myself wrong when I thought that INC members are "biblical" (daw).

    Does Corinthians say Jesus dies again when we celebrate the Eucharist?

    1 Corinthians 11:23-30:

    For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, "This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me." In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me." For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes. Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.

Purihin ang Dios! Purihin si Cristo at ang kanyang nag-iisang Iglesia!

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Do Catholics Base Their Beliefs On Tradition And Not The Bible?


Misconception: Catholic’s base their beliefs on tradition and don’t really read the Bible.


True Catholic Teaching: The teaching authority of the Catholic Church is obtained both from Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the Magesterium. The Magesterium is the teaching authority of the Church comprised of the Church’s Bishops, led by the Pope to interpret the truths of the Faith. Catholics believe that the Bible is the inspired Word of God. It is a gift from God that reveals His great plan of salvation for us all. However, since it was written by humans at a specific time and in a specific place, Catholics do not believe that everything we need to know about God is contained in the pages of Scripture. As John says at the end of his Gospel, “There are also many other things that Jesus did, but if these were to be described individually, I do not think the whole world would contain the books that would be written.” The Catholic Church’s Traditions are those things that the Apostles witnessed and handed down by word of mouth and by example over the years, but were not recorded in the final version of the Bible.

The idea of sola scriptura is one that is very prevalent in Protestant denominations. Sola scriptura is the notion that scripture alone is the foundation of faith, and contains all revealed truth in Christianity. A common misconception that Protestants hold is that since Catholics do not believe in sola scriptura, we therefore do not know the bible, and do not promote the importance of reading and applying the teachings of sacred scripture to our lives. However, this understanding of Catholicism is not correct.

Again, the teaching authority of the Catholic Church is obtained both from Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the Magesterium. Protestants tend to overlook the importance of Sacred Tradition in an effort to hold scripture as their sole basis of faith. Catholics do observe Sacred Scripture with high importance, as it is the inspired word of God. It is actually through the eyes of apostolic Tradition that scripture can be most fully understood, because they are so closely tied. The Second Vatican Council on Divine Revelation, says:

“Hence there exists a close connection and communication between sacred Tradition and sacred Scripture. For both of them, flowing from the same divine wellspring, in a certain way merge into a unity and tend toward the same end.”

The composition of the New Testament in fact, was not begun until nearly two decades after Christ’s death, and the books were slowly completed during the span of about fifty years. During this time, Christianity was based solely on tradition. That is, the teachings that were passed down from Christ’s apostles, which were received from the lips of Jesus, or through divine revelation or inspiration. The Second Vatican Council on Divine Revelation, says:

“For sacred Scripture is the word of God inasmuch as it is consigned to writing under the inspiration of the divine Spirit. To the successors of the apostles, sacred Tradition hands on in its full purity God’s word, which was entrusted to the apostles by Christ the Lord and the Holy Spirit.”

Christ instituted His Church as the authentic authority to interpret scripture, and to transmit, instruct, and explain the essential tenets of Christianity. It is in this way that the teaching authority of the Catholic Church utilizes both Sacred Scripture as well as Sacred Tradition to guide the faithful.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Local Government of Pangasinan Official Certification: Felix Manalo founded the Iglesia ni Cristo in 1914

Pangasinan Province officially acknowledge the FACT that the INC was FOUNDED not by Jesus but Felix Manalo: "having been FOUNDED (all caps mine) on July 27, 1914 by the late Executive Minister Felix Y. Manalo"!

Source: pangasinan.gov

CERTIFICATION

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the regular session duly constituted of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, Province of Pangasinan, held on September 17, 2012 at Lingayen, Pangasinan, the following provincial resolution was approved:


PROVINCIAL RESOLUTION NO. 329-2012


EXPRESSING CONGRATULATIONS AND BEST WISHES TO THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO ON THE OCCASION OF ITS 98th FOUNDING ANNIVERSARY


WHEREAS, the Iglesia ni Cristo is known to be one of the oldest religious organizations in the country, having been founded on July 27, 1914 by the late Executive Minister Felix Y. Manalo;

WHEREAS, today, the Iglesia ni Cristo has gone a long way from being a small group in the early 1900s to becoming a solid religious foundation in the Philippine archipelago and even all over the world;

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Why the proposed RH Bill should be junkedl!

Disunited nation

Source: PhilStar from A LAW EACH DAY (Keeps Trouble Away) By Jose C. Sison 

Photo Source: Ipaglaban Mo
Undoubtedly, the most controversial and divisive bill ever introduced in Congress is the “Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health, Population and Development” bill (RH bill). The title itself is already questionable as it covers several subjects, contrary to the universally accepted and ideal standard of statutes requiring only one subject.

The sad thing here is that this paralyzing disunity among us now is not of our own making. It is due to the machinations of international organizations and foreign entities which are trying to impose on us their own agenda of population control by means of a law (the RH bill) providing for universal access to artificial methods of birth control like contraception and sterilization.

More unfortunate is that in pushing for this RH bill, its foreign funded proponents and supporters concentrate their attack on the Catholic Church for its allegedly outmoded teachings against contraception and sterilization. And when the Church prelates responded to the attack by defending the Church teaching, they are even branded as “bishops at war”. Actually, the bishops are opposing the bill merely because, as good shepherds, they have to protect their flock from going astray or sinning, and from the known evil effects and dire consequences of contraception promoted by the bill.

My Blog List

My Calendar